Whole‐exome sequencing for mutation detection in pediatric disorders of insulin secretion: maturity onset diabetes of the young and congenital hyperinsulinism
Pediatric diabetes, 2018•Wiley Online Library
Background To assess the utility of whole‐exome sequencing (WES) for mutation detection
in maturity‐onset diabetes of the young (MODY) and congenital hyperinsulinism (CHI).
MODY and CHI are the two commonest monogenic disorders of glucose‐regulated insulin
secretion in childhood, with 13 causative genes known for MODY and 10 causative genes
identified for CHI. The large number of potential genes makes comprehensive screening
using traditional methods expensive and time‐consuming. Methods Ten subjects with …
in maturity‐onset diabetes of the young (MODY) and congenital hyperinsulinism (CHI).
MODY and CHI are the two commonest monogenic disorders of glucose‐regulated insulin
secretion in childhood, with 13 causative genes known for MODY and 10 causative genes
identified for CHI. The large number of potential genes makes comprehensive screening
using traditional methods expensive and time‐consuming. Methods Ten subjects with …
Background
To assess the utility of whole‐exome sequencing (WES) for mutation detection in maturity‐onset diabetes of the young (MODY) and congenital hyperinsulinism (CHI). MODY and CHI are the two commonest monogenic disorders of glucose‐regulated insulin secretion in childhood, with 13 causative genes known for MODY and 10 causative genes identified for CHI. The large number of potential genes makes comprehensive screening using traditional methods expensive and time‐consuming.
Methods
Ten subjects with MODY and five with CHI with known mutations underwent WES using two different exome capture kits (Nimblegen SeqCap EZ Human v3.0 Exome Enrichment Kit, Nextera Rapid Capture Exome Kit). Analysis was blinded to previously identified mutations, and included assessment for large deletions. The target capture of five exome capture technologies was also analyzed using sequencing data from >2800 unrelated samples.
Results
Four of five MODY mutations were identified using Nimblegen (including a large deletion in HNF1B). Although targeted, one mutation (in INS) had insufficient coverage for detection. Eleven of eleven mutations (six MODY, five CHI) were identified using Nextera Rapid (including the previously missed mutation). On reconciliation, all mutations concorded with previous data and no additional variants in MODY genes were detected. There were marked differences in the performance of the capture technologies.
Conclusions
WES can be useful for screening for MODY/CHI mutations, detecting both point mutations and large deletions. However, capture technologies require careful selection.
Wiley Online Library