A study of proximal tubular compliances in normotensive and spontaneously hypertensive rats, and the effect of anaesthesia on the compliance

PP Leyssac, PK Jensen… - Acta physiologica …, 1986 - Wiley Online Library
PP Leyssac, PK Jensen, NH Holstein‐Rathlou
Acta physiologica scandinavica, 1986Wiley Online Library
Proximal tubular compliance (C) was measured in free flow microperfusion experiments
from the initial slope of the increase in proximal luminal pressure divided by the step input of
volume flow delivered from a microperfusion pipette inserted in a downstream proximal
convolution. Five groups of rats were studied: Munich Wistar (WU, n= 11) and Sprague‐
Dawley rats (SPRD, n= 6) anaesthetized with inactin; and SPRD (n= 11), Wistar Kyoto (WKY,
n= 9), and sponaneously hypertensive rats (SHR, n= 11) anaesthetized with halothane. In …
Proximal tubular compliance (C) was measured in free flow microperfusion experiments from the initial slope of the increase in proximal luminal pressure divided by the step input of volume flow delivered from a microperfusion pipette inserted in a downstream proximal convolution. Five groups of rats were studied: Munich Wistar (WU, n = 11) and Sprague‐Dawley rats (SPRD, n = 6) anaesthetized with inactin; and SPRD (n = 11), Wistar Kyoto (WKY, n = 9), and sponaneously hypertensive rats (SHR, n = 11) anaesthetized with halothane. In the inactin groups, C was: 0.309 ± 0.161 and 0.266 ± 0.136 nl mm Hg‐1, respectively. In the halothane groups, C was: 0.125 ± 0.023, 0.125 ± 0.029, and 0.119 ± 0.0127 nl mm Hg‐1, respectively. The means in the inactin groups were significantly higher than those from the halothane groups (P < 0.001). It is concluded that the choice of anaesthetics has a profound influence on the proximal tubular compliance in the rat, and that the compliance of SHR is equal to that of normotensive rats.
Wiley Online Library