Impact of obesity on neuropathic late complications in NIDDM

RH Straub, M Thum, C Hollerbach, KD Palitzsch… - Diabetes …, 1994 - Am Diabetes Assoc
RH Straub, M Thum, C Hollerbach, KD Palitzsch, J Schölmerich
Diabetes care, 1994Am Diabetes Assoc
OBJECTIVE This cross-sectional study was aimed to investigate the isolated influence of
obesity on peripheral sensorimotor and autonomic neuropathy in patients with long-term
non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
Ninety-one long-term NIDDM patients with a mean duration of 13.6±1.0 years and a mean
age of 60.4±1.0 years were divided into two groups according to their body mass index
(BMI)(lean with a BMI< 26.5: n= 41, age= 58.6±1.7 years, BMI= 23.7±0.3 kg/m2; and obese …
OBJECTIVE
This cross-sectional study was aimed to investigate the isolated influence of obesity on peripheral sensorimotor and autonomic neuropathy in patients with long-term non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM).
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
Ninety-one long-term NIDDM patients with a mean duration of 13.6 ± 1.0 years and a mean age of 60.4 ± 1.0 years were divided into two groups according to their body mass index (BMI) (lean with a BMI < 26.5: n = 41, age = 58.6 ± 1.7 years, BMI = 23.7 ± 0.3 kg/m2; and obese with a BMI ≥ 26.5: n = 50, age = 61.9 ± 1.2 years, BMI = 30.5 ± 0.5 kg/m2). The two groups were not different in age, duration, gender, current parameters of glycemic control, number of smokers, cholesterol, triglycerides, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Neuropathic late complications were scrutinized by a standardized clinical examination that delivers a neuropathy score, pupillary autonomic neuropathy assessed by pupillometry, and cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy using a standardized test battery.
RESULTS
One-way analysis of variance revealed that obese patients had poor results in the clinical neuropathy test (overall score in obese vs. lean: 71.1 ± 2.9 vs. 80.6 ± 3.0 points, 2P = 0.0266; 100 points were absolutely normal). This was particularly true for the discrimination perception (obese vs. lean: 67.0 ± 4.0 vs. 81.7 ± 3.3 points, 2P = 0.0073) and the reflex status (obese vs. lean: 57.4 ± 4.0 vs. 71.8 ± 4.3 points, 2P = 0.0164). Furthermore, obese patients had a poor result in the respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) test, one of six autonomic function tests (RSA: obese vs. lean in average RSA percentile: 36.9 ± 4.9 vs. 54.0 ± 5.9%, 2P = 0.0264).
CONCLUSIONS
Obesity influences sensorimotor and autonomic neuropathic late complications. The poor result in RSA in obesity may indicate an interrelation between pathogenesis of obesity and disorders of the respiratory and heart rhythm-generating control centers in the brain stem. Moreover, it could be due to intrathoracic fat deposits that alter lung mobility. Body mass control may be an important approach to reduce neuropathic complications. Beyond that, it seems necessary to control for body mass when comparing neuropathy in two groups of patients with NIDDM.
Am Diabetes Assoc