The apelin receptor inhibits the angiotensin II type 1 receptor via allosteric trans‐inhibition

K Siddiquee, J Hampton, D McAnally… - British journal of …, 2013 - Wiley Online Library
K Siddiquee, J Hampton, D McAnally, LT May, LH Smith
British journal of pharmacology, 2013Wiley Online Library
Background and Purpose The apelin receptor (APJ) is often co‐expressed with the
angiotensin II type‐1 receptor (AT 1) and acts as an endogenous counter‐regulator. Apelin
antagonizes Ang II signalling, but the precise molecular mechanism has not been
elucidated. Understanding this interaction may lead to new therapies for the treatment of
cardiovascular disease. Experimental Approach The physical interaction of APJ and AT 1
receptors was detected by co‐immunoprecipitation and bioluminescence resonance energy …
Background and Purpose
The apelin receptor (APJ) is often co‐expressed with the angiotensin II type‐1 receptor (AT1) and acts as an endogenous counter‐regulator. Apelin antagonizes Ang II signalling, but the precise molecular mechanism has not been elucidated. Understanding this interaction may lead to new therapies for the treatment of cardiovascular disease.
Experimental Approach
The physical interaction of APJ and AT1 receptors was detected by co‐immunoprecipitation and bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET). Functional and pharmacological interactions were measured by G‐protein‐dependent signalling and recruitment of β‐arrestin. Allosterism and cooperativity between APJ and AT1 were measured by radioligand binding assays.
Key Results
Apelin, but not Ang II, induced APJ : AT1 heterodimerization forced AT1 into a low‐affinity state, reducing Ang II binding. Likewise, apelin mediated a concentration‐dependent depression in the maximal production of inositol phosphate (IP1) and β‐arrestin recruitment to AT1 in response to Ang II. The signal depression approached a limit, the magnitude of which was governed by the cooperativity indicative of a negative allosteric interaction. Fitting the data to an operational model of allosterism revealed that apelin‐mediated heterodimerization significantly reduces Ang II signalling efficacy. These effects were not observed in the absence of apelin.
Conclusions and Implications
Apelin‐dependent heterodimerization between APJ and AT1 causes negative allosteric regulation of AT1 function. As AT1 is significant in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease, these findings suggest that impaired apelin and APJ function may be a common underlying aetiology.
Linked Article
This article is commented on by Goupil et al., pp. 1101–1103 of this issue. To view this commentary visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.12040
Wiley Online Library