The effect of inhaled IFN-β on worsening of asthma symptoms caused by viral infections. A randomized trial

R Djukanović, T Harrison, SL Johnston… - American journal of …, 2014 - atsjournals.org
R Djukanović, T Harrison, SL Johnston, F Gabbay, P Wark, NC Thomson, R Niven, D Singh…
American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2014atsjournals.org
Rationale: Ex vivo, bronchial epithelial cells from people with asthma are more susceptible
to rhinovirus infection caused by deficient induction of the antiviral protein, IFN-β.
Exogenous IFN-β restores antiviral activity. Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of
inhaled IFN-β with placebo administered to people with asthma after onset of cold symptoms
to prevent or attenuate asthma symptoms caused by respiratory viruses. Methods: A total of
147 people with asthma on inhaled corticosteroids (British Thoracic Society Steps 2–5), with …
Rationale: Ex vivo, bronchial epithelial cells from people with asthma are more susceptible to rhinovirus infection caused by deficient induction of the antiviral protein, IFN-β. Exogenous IFN-β restores antiviral activity.
Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of inhaled IFN-β with placebo administered to people with asthma after onset of cold symptoms to prevent or attenuate asthma symptoms caused by respiratory viruses.
Methods: A total of 147 people with asthma on inhaled corticosteroids (British Thoracic Society Steps 2–5), with a history of virus-associated exacerbations, were randomized to 14-day treatment with inhaled IFN-β (n = 72) or placebo (n = 75) within 24 hours of developing cold symptoms and were assessed clinically, with relevant samples collected to assess virus infection and antiviral responses.
Measurements and Main Results: A total of 91% of randomized patients developed a defined cold. In this modified intention-to-treat population, asthma symptoms did not get clinically significantly worse (mean change in six-item Asthma Control Questionnaire <0.5) and IFN-β treatment had no significant effect on this primary endpoint, although it enhanced morning peak expiratory flow recovery (P = 0.033), reduced the need for additional treatment, and boosted innate immunity as assessed by blood and sputum biomarkers. In an exploratory analysis of the subset of more difficult-to-treat, Step 4-5 people with asthma (n = 27 IFN-β; n = 31 placebo), Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 increased significantly on placebo; this was prevented by IFN-β (P = 0.004).
Conclusions: Although the trial did not meet its primary endpoint, it suggests that inhaled IFN-β is a potential treatment for virus-induced deteriorations of asthma in difficult-to-treat people with asthma and supports the need for further, adequately powered, trials in this population.
Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 01126177).
ATS Journals