Screening for depression among patients with multiple sclerosis: two questions may be enough

DC Mohr, SL Hart, L Julian… - Multiple Sclerosis …, 2007 - journals.sagepub.com
DC Mohr, SL Hart, L Julian, ES Tasch
Multiple Sclerosis Journal, 2007journals.sagepub.com
Background Depression among patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) is common and has a
significant impact on quality of life. As many as two-thirds of depressed MS patients receive
no treatment for their depression. While guidelines for depression management suggest
screening, the only validated screening tools are questionnaires, which have not been
widely implemented in practice. This is the first study on the effectiveness of using two
questions assessing mood and anhedonia (loss of interest or pleasure) in screening for …
Background
Depression among patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) is common and has a significant impact on quality of life. As many as two-thirds of depressed MS patients receive no treatment for their depression. While guidelines for depression management suggest screening, the only validated screening tools are questionnaires, which have not been widely implemented in practice. This is the first study on the effectiveness of using two questions assessing mood and anhedonia (loss of interest or pleasure) in screening for major depressive disorder (MDD) in MS.
Methods
MS patients under the care of neurologists were recruited from a large health maintenance organization (HMO). The MDD module of the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-IV and screening questions was administered.
Results
Of the 260 participants, 26% met the criteria for MDD. Among patients with MDD, 67% received no anti-depressant medication. The MDD screen identified 99% (95% CI: 91–100%) of cases.
Discussion
A brief, two question screen is reliable in identifying MS patients with MDD. This suggests that asking these two brief questions could identify almost all MS patients meeting MDD criteria, with minimal numbers of false positives.
Multiple Sclerosis 2007; 13: 215–219. http://msj.sagepub.com
Sage Journals