[HTML][HTML] Evidence based selection of housekeeping genes

HJM de Jonge, RSN Fehrmann, ESJM de Bont… - PloS one, 2007 - journals.plos.org
HJM de Jonge, RSN Fehrmann, ESJM de Bont, RMW Hofstra, F Gerbens, WA Kamps…
PloS one, 2007journals.plos.org
For accurate and reliable gene expression analysis, normalization of gene expression data
against housekeeping genes (reference or internal control genes) is required. It is known
that commonly used housekeeping genes (eg ACTB, GAPDH, HPRT1, and B2M) vary
considerably under different experimental conditions and therefore their use for
normalization is limited. We performed a meta-analysis of 13,629 human gene array
samples in order to identify the most stable expressed genes. Here we show novel …
For accurate and reliable gene expression analysis, normalization of gene expression data against housekeeping genes (reference or internal control genes) is required. It is known that commonly used housekeeping genes (e.g. ACTB, GAPDH, HPRT1, and B2M) vary considerably under different experimental conditions and therefore their use for normalization is limited. We performed a meta-analysis of 13,629 human gene array samples in order to identify the most stable expressed genes. Here we show novel candidate housekeeping genes (e.g. RPS13, RPL27, RPS20 and OAZ1) with enhanced stability among a multitude of different cell types and varying experimental conditions. None of the commonly used housekeeping genes were present in the top 50 of the most stable expressed genes. In addition, using 2,543 diverse mouse gene array samples we were able to confirm the enhanced stability of the candidate novel housekeeping genes in another mammalian species. Therefore, the identified novel candidate housekeeping genes seem to be the most appropriate choice for normalizing gene expression data.
PLOS