Data-driven discovery and validation of circulating blood-based biomarkers associated with prevalent atrial fibrillation

W Chua, Y Purmah, VR Cardoso… - European heart …, 2019 - academic.oup.com
W Chua, Y Purmah, VR Cardoso, GV Gkoutos, SP Tull, G Neculau, MR Thomas, D Kotecha
European heart journal, 2019academic.oup.com
Aims Undetected atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major health concern. Blood biomarkers
associated with AF could simplify patient selection for screening and further inform ongoing
research towards stratified prevention and treatment of AF. Methods and results Forty
common cardiovascular biomarkers were quantified in 638 consecutive patients referred to
hospital [mean±standard deviation age 70±12 years, 398 (62%) male, 294 (46%) with AF]
with known AF or≥ 2 CHA2DS2-VASc risk factors. Paroxysmal or silent AF was ruled out by …
Aims
Undetected atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major health concern. Blood biomarkers associated with AF could simplify patient selection for screening and further inform ongoing research towards stratified prevention and treatment of AF.
Methods and results
Forty common cardiovascular biomarkers were quantified in 638 consecutive patients referred to hospital [mean ± standard deviation age 70 ± 12 years, 398 (62%) male, 294 (46%) with AF] with known AF or ≥2 CHA2DS2-VASc risk factors. Paroxysmal or silent AF was ruled out by 7-day ECG monitoring. Logistic regression with forward selection and machine learning algorithms were used to determine clinical risk factors, imaging parameters, and biomarkers associated with AF. Atrial fibrillation was significantly associated with age [bootstrapped odds ratio (OR) per year = 1.060, 95% confidence interval (1.04–1.10); P =0.001], male sex [OR = 2.022 (1.28–3.56); P =0.008], body mass index [BMI, OR per unit = 1.060 (1.02–1.12); P =0.003], elevated brain natriuretic peptide [BNP, OR per fold change = 1.293 (1.11–1.63); P =0.002], elevated fibroblast growth factor-23 [FGF-23, OR = 1.667 (1.36–2.34); P =0.001], and reduced TNF-related apoptosis-induced ligand-receptor 2 [TRAIL-R2, OR = 0.242 (0.14–0.32); P = 0.001], but not other biomarkers. Biomarkers improved the prediction of AF compared with clinical risk factors alone (net reclassification improvement = 0.178; P <0.001). Both logistic regression and machine learning predicted AF well during validation [area under the receiver-operator curve = 0.684 (0.62–0.75) and 0.697 (0.63–0.76), respectively].
Conclusion
Three simple clinical risk factors (age, sex, and BMI) and two biomarkers (elevated BNP and elevated FGF-23) identify patients with AF. Further research is warranted to elucidate FGF-23 dependent mechanisms of AF.
Oxford University Press