Prospective randomized phase II trial of accelerated reepithelialization of superficial second-degree burn wounds using extracorporeal shock wave therapy

C Ottomann, A Stojadinovic, PT Lavin… - Annals of …, 2012 - journals.lww.com
C Ottomann, A Stojadinovic, PT Lavin, FH Gannon, MH Heggeness, R Thiele, W Schaden…
Annals of surgery, 2012journals.lww.com
Background: As extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) can enhance healing of skin
graft donor sites, this study focused on shock wave effects in burn wounds. Methods: A
predefined cohort of 50 patients (6 with incomplete data or lost to follow-up) with acute
second-degree burns from a larger study of 100 patients were randomly assigned between
December 2006 and December 2007 to receive standard therapy (burn wound
debridement/topical antiseptic therapy) with (n= 22) or without (n= 22) defocused ESWT …
Background:
As extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) can enhance healing of skin graft donor sites, this study focused on shock wave effects in burn wounds.
Methods:
A predefined cohort of 50 patients (6 with incomplete data or lost to follow-up) with acute second-degree burns from a larger study of 100 patients were randomly assigned between December 2006 and December 2007 to receive standard therapy (burn wound debridement/topical antiseptic therapy) with (n= 22) or without (n= 22) defocused ESWT (100 impulses/cm 2 at 0.1 mJ/mm 2) applied once to the study burn, after debridement. Randomization sequence was computer-generated, and patients were blinded to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint, time to complete burn wound epithelialization, was determined by independent, blinded-observer. A worst case scenario was applied to the missing cases to rule out the impact of withdrawal bias.
Results:
Patient characteristics across the 2 study groups were balanced (P> 0.05) except for older age (53±17 vs. 38±13 years, P= 0.002) in the ESWT group. Mean time to complete (≥ 95%) epithelialization (CE) for patients that did and did not undergo ESWT was 9.6±1.7 and 12.5±2.2 days, respectively (P< 0.0005). When age (continuous variable) and treatment group (binary) were examined in a linear regression model to control the baseline age imbalance, time to CE, age was not significant (P= 0.33) and treatment group retained significance (P< 0.0005). Statistical significance (P= 0.001) was retained when ESWT cases with missing follow-up were assigned the longest time to CE and when controls with missing follow-up were assigned the shortest time to CE.
Conclusions:
In this randomized phase II study, application of a single defocused shock wave treatment to the superficial second-degree burn wound after debridement/topical antiseptic therapy significantly accelerated epithelialization. This finding warrants confirmation in a larger phase III trial (ClinicalTrials. gov identifier: NCT01242423).
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins