Second-line oxaliplatin, folinic acid, and fluorouracil versus folinic acid and fluorouracil alone for gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer: outcomes from the CONKO …
H Oettle, H Riess, JM Stieler, G Heil… - Journal of Clinical …, 2014 - ascopubs.org
H Oettle, H Riess, JM Stieler, G Heil, I Schwaner, J Seraphin, M Görner, M Mölle, TF Greten…
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2014•ascopubs.orgPurpose To assess the efficacy of a second-line regimen of oxaliplatin and folinic acid–
modulated fluorouracil in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who have experienced
progression while receiving gemcitabine monotherapy. Patients and Methods A
randomized, open-label, phase III study was conducted in 16 institutions throughout
Germany. Recruitment ran from January 2004 until May 2007, and the last follow-up
concluded in December 2012. Overall, 168 patients age 18 years or older who experienced …
modulated fluorouracil in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who have experienced
progression while receiving gemcitabine monotherapy. Patients and Methods A
randomized, open-label, phase III study was conducted in 16 institutions throughout
Germany. Recruitment ran from January 2004 until May 2007, and the last follow-up
concluded in December 2012. Overall, 168 patients age 18 years or older who experienced …
Purpose
To assess the efficacy of a second-line regimen of oxaliplatin and folinic acid–modulated fluorouracil in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who have experienced progression while receiving gemcitabine monotherapy.
Patients and Methods
A randomized, open-label, phase III study was conducted in 16 institutions throughout Germany. Recruitment ran from January 2004 until May 2007, and the last follow-up concluded in December 2012. Overall, 168 patients age 18 years or older who experienced disease progression during first-line gemcitabine therapy were randomly assigned to folinic acid and fluorouracil (FF) or oxaliplatin and FF (OFF). Patients were stratified according to the presence of metastases, duration of first-line therapy, and Karnofsky performance status.
Results
Median follow-up was 54.1 months, and 160 patients were eligible for the primary analysis. The median overall survival in the OFF group (5.9 months; 95% CI, 4.1 to 7.4) versus the FF group (3.3 months; 95% CI, 2.7 to 4.0) was significantly improved (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.91; log-rank P = .010). Time to progression with OFF (2.9 months; 95% CI, 2.4 to 3.2) versus FF (2.0 months; 95% CI, 1.6 to 2.3) was significantly extended also (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.94; log-rank P = .019). Rates of adverse events were similar between treatment arms, with the exception of grades 1 to 2 neurotoxicity, which were reported in 29 patients (38.2%) and six patients (7.1%) in the OFF and FF groups, respectively (P < .001).
Conclusion
Second-line OFF significantly extended the duration of overall survival when compared with FF alone in patients with advanced gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer.
