Increased small intestinal permeability in ulcerative colitis: rather genetic than environmental and a risk factor for extensive disease?

C Büning, N Geissler, M Prager, A Sturm… - Inflammatory bowel …, 2012 - academic.oup.com
C Büning, N Geissler, M Prager, A Sturm, DC Baumgart, J Büttner, S Bühner, V Haas…
Inflammatory bowel diseases, 2012academic.oup.com
Background A disturbed epithelial barrier could play a pivotal role in ulcerative colitis (UC).
We performed a family-based study analyzing in vivo gastrointestinal permeability in
patients with UC, their healthy relatives, spouses, and controls. Methods In total, 89 patients
with UC in remission, 35 first-degree relatives (UC-R), 24 nonrelated spouses (UC-NR), and
99 healthy controls (HC) were studied. Permeability was assessed by a sugar-drink test
using sucrose (gastroduodenal permeability), lactulose/mannitol (intestinal permeability) …
Background
A disturbed epithelial barrier could play a pivotal role in ulcerative colitis (UC). We performed a family-based study analyzing in vivo gastrointestinal permeability in patients with UC, their healthy relatives, spouses, and controls.
Methods
In total, 89 patients with UC in remission, 35 first-degree relatives (UC-R), 24 nonrelated spouses (UC-NR), and 99 healthy controls (HC) were studied. Permeability was assessed by a sugar-drink test using sucrose (gastroduodenal permeability), lactulose/mannitol (intestinal permeability), and sucralose (colonic permeability). Data were correlated with clinical characteristics including medical treatment.
Results
Increased intestinal permeability was detected significantly more often in UC patients in remission (25/89, 28.1%) compared with HC (6/99, 6.1%; P < 0.001). Similar results were obtained in UC-R (7/35, 20.0%; P = 0.01 compared with HC) regardless of sharing the same household with the patients or not. No difference was found between UC-NR (3/24, 12.5%) and HC. Notably, in UC patients increased intestinal permeability was found in 12/28 patients (42.9%) with pancolitis, 7/30 (23.3%) patients with left-sided colitis, and in 2/19 (10.5%) patients with proctitis (P = 0.04). Gastroduodenal and colonic permeability were similar in all groups. Among patients on azathioprine, increased intestinal permeability was only seen in 1/18 (5.6%) patients. In contrast, in 24/70 (34.3%) patients without azathioprine, an increased intestinal permeability was found (P = 0.005).
Conclusions
An increased intestinal but not colonic permeability was found in UC patients in clinical remission that could mark a new risk factor for extensive disease location. Similar findings in healthy relatives but not spouses suggest that this barrier defect is genetically determined.
Oxford University Press