Gender differences in the accuracy of self-evaluations of performance.

S Beyer - Journal of personality and social psychology, 1990 - psycnet.apa.org
Journal of personality and social psychology, 1990psycnet.apa.org
Research has shown that gender differences in self-perceptions exist. However,
interpretational ambiguities make it impossible to determine whether these gender
differences are due to the operation of biases. The present research investigated whether
gender differences in biased self-perceptions exist by assessing the accuracy of posttask
self-evaluations of performance. In accordance with self-consistency theory, it was
hypothesized that Ss' expectancies affect their posttask self-evaluations. For example, men …
Abstract
Research has shown that gender differences in self-perceptions exist. However, interpretational ambiguities make it impossible to determine whether these gender differences are due to the operation of biases. The present research investigated whether gender differences in biased self-perceptions exist by assessing the accuracy of posttask self-evaluations of performance. In accordance with self-consistency theory, it was hypothesized that Ss' expectancies affect their posttask self-evaluations. For example, men who generally have high expectancies on masculine-gender-typed tasks were hypothesized to evidence overly positive self-evaluations. Women, who generally hold low expectancies on masculine tasks, were hypothesized to hold overly negative self-evaluations. Results confirmed that self-consistency tendencies can partially explain self-perception biases. The implications of these findings for women's achievement behavior and self-confidence are discussed.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)
American Psychological Association