[HTML][HTML] Transcriptomic analysis of human polarized macrophages: more than one role of alternative activation?

E Derlindati, A Dei Cas, B Montanini, V Spigoni… - PloS one, 2015 - journals.plos.org
E Derlindati, A Dei Cas, B Montanini, V Spigoni, V Curella, R Aldigeri, D Ardigò, I Zavaroni
PloS one, 2015journals.plos.org
Background Macrophages are a heterogeneous cell population which in response to the
cytokine milieu polarize in either classically activated macrophages (M1) or alternatively
activated macrophages (M2). This plasticity makes macrophages essential in regulating
inflammation, immune response and tissue remodeling and a novel therapeutic target in
inflammatory diseases such as atherosclerosis. The aim of the study was to describe the
transcriptomic profiles of differently polarized human macrophages to generate new …
Background
Macrophages are a heterogeneous cell population which in response to the cytokine milieu polarize in either classically activated macrophages (M1) or alternatively activated macrophages (M2). This plasticity makes macrophages essential in regulating inflammation, immune response and tissue remodeling and a novel therapeutic target in inflammatory diseases such as atherosclerosis. The aim of the study was to describe the transcriptomic profiles of differently polarized human macrophages to generate new hypotheses on the biological function of the different macrophage subtypes.
Methods and Results
Polarization of circulating monocytes/macrophages of blood donors was induced in vitro by IFN-γ and LPS (M1), by IL-4 (M2a), and by IL-10 (M2c). Unstimulated cells (RM) served as time controls. Gene expression profile of M1, M2a, M2c and RM was assessed at 6, 12 and 24h after polarization with Whole Human Genome Agilent Microarray technique. When compared to RM, M1 significantly upregulated pathways involved in immunity and inflammation, whereas M2a did the opposite. Conversely, decreased and increased expression of mitochondrial metabolism, consistent with insulin resistant and insulin sensitive patterns, was seen in M1 and M2a, respectively. The time sequence in the expression of some pathways appeared to have some specific bearing on M1 function. Finally, canonical and non-canonical Wnt genes and gene groups, promoting inflammation and tissue remodeling, were upregulated in M2a compared to RM.
Conclusion
Our data in in vitro polarized human macrophages: 1. confirm and extend known inflammatory and anti-inflammatory gene expression patterns; 2. demonstrate changes in mitochondrial metabolism associated to insulin resistance and insulin sensitivity in M1 and M2a, respectively; 3. highlight the potential relevance of gene expression timing in M1 function; 4. unveil enhanced expression of Wnt pathways in M2a suggesting a potential dual (pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory) role of M2a in inflammatory diseases.
PLOS