Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: present understanding and future options

RM Du Bois - European Respiratory Review, 2011 - Eur Respiratory Soc
RM Du Bois
European Respiratory Review, 2011Eur Respiratory Soc
The past decade has been extraordinarily fruitful for the study and management of idiopathic
pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). The ability of physicians to make a clear and definitive diagnosis
has greatly improved, and a proliferation of clinical studies has started to build an evidence
base upon which rational treatment decisions can be built. Nevertheless, the challenges
facing patients and physicians remain formidable. The number of people dying from
pulmonary fibrosis in the USA has increased by 50% in just 10 yrs (1992–2003)(fig. 1). The …
The past decade has been extraordinarily fruitful for the study and management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). The ability of physicians to make a clear and definitive diagnosis has greatly improved, and a proliferation of clinical studies has started to build an evidence base upon which rational treatment decisions can be built. Nevertheless, the challenges facing patients and physicians remain formidable. The number of people dying from pulmonary fibrosis in the USA has increased by 50% in just 10 yrs (1992–2003)(fig. 1). The 175,088 deaths in such a short period highlight the devastating nature of this attritional lung disease, putting it on a par with many cancers in terms of outcome [1, 2].
The progression of IPF over time is characterised by repeated, focal episodes of epithelial cell perturbation and subsequent established fibrosis occurring over many years, resulting in a pattern of histopathology that is both temporally and spatially heterogeneous. Because of the repeated epithelial cell perturbation over time, much of the pathology consists of fixed fibrosis when the patient first presents requesting advice, with relatively little pathology that is amenable to improvement in response to any therapy. The nature of the disease process, and the likely response to treatment, therefore, means that we must be careful to set limits on expectations (for physicians and patients alike) of what any treatment can achieve. Since cure is currently impossible, the treatment goal should be to stabilise the disease if possible or at the least reduce the rate of progression. The new treatments needed to meet this treatment goal are now starting to emerge after a decade of unprecedented research activity, with significant and highly encouraging increases in the size and number of clinical studies and with the incremental increase in knowledge about the behaviour of the disease that has been gained over the past decade. In this regard, in the period of 1989–1999 a total of 114 patients were enrolled in four IPF studies [3–6], whereas the following decade (2000–2010) saw almost 3,000 patients enrolled in 11 studies (fig. 2)[7–16].
European Respiratory Society