[CITATION][C] The brussels score
G Bernard - Sepsis, 1997 - Springer
Sepsis, 1997•Springer
The Brussels score was developed through a series of consensus conferences including the
antioxidants in ARDS Study Group (Chicago, July 1993), the Acute Lung Injury SCOR
Coordination Group (Bethesda, September 1993), and the Roundtable Group on the Design
of Clinical Trials for Sepsis (Brussels, March 1994)[1]. The score grades organ dysfunction in
six different systems (cardiovascular, pulmonary, CNS, coagulation, renal, and hepatic) with
five gradations of severity ranging from normal function to extreme dysfunction (Table 1). For …
antioxidants in ARDS Study Group (Chicago, July 1993), the Acute Lung Injury SCOR
Coordination Group (Bethesda, September 1993), and the Roundtable Group on the Design
of Clinical Trials for Sepsis (Brussels, March 1994)[1]. The score grades organ dysfunction in
six different systems (cardiovascular, pulmonary, CNS, coagulation, renal, and hepatic) with
five gradations of severity ranging from normal function to extreme dysfunction (Table 1). For …
The Brussels score was developed through a series of consensus conferences including the antioxidants in ARDS Study Group (Chicago, July 1993), the Acute Lung Injury SCOR Coordination Group (Bethesda, September 1993), and the Roundtable Group on the Design of Clinical Trials for Sepsis (Brussels, March 1994)[1]. The score grades organ dysfunction in six different systems (cardiovascular, pulmonary, CNS, coagulation, renal, and hepatic) with five gradations of severity ranging from normal function to extreme dysfunction (Table 1). For each system, there is also a dichotomous cutoff representing clinically significant organ dysfunction.
Springer