Separate impact of obesity and glucose tolerance on the incretin effect in normal subjects and type 2 diabetic patients

E Muscelli, A Mari, A Casolaro, S Camastra… - Diabetes, 2008 - Am Diabetes Assoc
Diabetes, 2008Am Diabetes Assoc
OBJECTIVE—To quantitate the separate impact of obesity and hyperlycemia on the incretin
effect (ie, the gain in β-cell function after oral glucose versus intravenous glucose).
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Isoglycemic oral (75 g) and intravenous glucose
administration was performed in 51 subjects (24 with normal glucose tolerance [NGT], 17
with impaired glucose tolerance [IGT], and 10 with type 2 diabetes) with a wide range of BMI
(20–61 kg/m2). C-peptide deconvolution was used to reconstruct insulin secretion rates, and …
OBJECTIVE—To quantitate the separate impact of obesity and hyperlycemia on the incretin effect (i.e., the gain in β-cell function after oral glucose versus intravenous glucose).
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Isoglycemic oral (75 g) and intravenous glucose administration was performed in 51 subjects (24 with normal glucose tolerance [NGT], 17 with impaired glucose tolerance [IGT], and 10 with type 2 diabetes) with a wide range of BMI (20–61 kg/m2). C-peptide deconvolution was used to reconstruct insulin secretion rates, and β-cell glucose sensitivity (slope of the insulin secretion/glucose concentration dose-response curve) was determined by mathematical modeling. The incretin effect was defined as the oral-to-intravenous ratio of responses. In 8 subjects with NGT and 10 with diabetes, oral glucose appearance was measured by the double-tracer technique.
RESULTS—The incretin effect on total insulin secretion and β-cell glucose sensitivity and the GLP-1 response to oral glucose were significantly reduced in diabetes compared with NGT or IGT (P ≤ 0.05). The results were similar when subjects were stratified by BMI tertile (P ≤ 0.05). In the whole dataset, each manifestation of the incretin effect was inversely related to both glucose tolerance (2-h plasma glucose levels) and BMI (partial r = 0.27–0.59, P ≤ 0.05) in an independent, additive manner. Oral glucose appearance did not differ between diabetes and NGT and was positively related to the GLP-1 response (r = 0.53, P < 0.01). Glucagon suppression during the oral glucose tolerance test was blunted in diabetic patients.
CONCLUSIONS—Potentiation of insulin secretion, glucose sensing, glucagon-like peptide-1 release, and glucagon suppression are physiological manifestations of the incretin effect. Glucose tolerance and obesity impair the incretin effect independently of one another.
Am Diabetes Assoc