Conjunctival transcriptome in scarring trachoma

MJ Burton, SN Rajak, J Bauer, HA Weiss… - Infection and …, 2011 - Am Soc Microbiol
MJ Burton, SN Rajak, J Bauer, HA Weiss, SB Tolbert, A Shoo, E Habtamu, A Manjurano
Infection and immunity, 2011Am Soc Microbiol
Trachoma is a poorly understood immunofibrogenic disease process, initiated by Chlamydia
trachomatis. Differences in conjunctival gene expression profiles between Ethiopians with
trachomatous trichiasis (with [TTI] or without [TT] inflammation) and controls (C) were
investigated to identify relevant host responses. Tarsal conjunctival swab samples were
collected for RNA isolation and C. trachomatis PCR. Transcriptome-wide microarray
experiments were conducted on 42 samples (TTI, n= 13; TT, n= 15; C, n= 14). Specific …
Abstract
Trachoma is a poorly understood immunofibrogenic disease process, initiated by Chlamydia trachomatis. Differences in conjunctival gene expression profiles between Ethiopians with trachomatous trichiasis (with [TTI] or without [TT] inflammation) and controls (C) were investigated to identify relevant host responses. Tarsal conjunctival swab samples were collected for RNA isolation and C. trachomatis PCR. Transcriptome-wide microarray experiments were conducted on 42 samples (TTI, n = 13; TT, n = 15; C, n =14). Specific results were confirmed by using multiplex quantitative reverse transcription-PCR for 16 mRNA targets in an independent collection of case-control samples: 386 case-control pairs (TTI, n = 244; TT, n = 142; C, n = 386). The gene expression profiles of cases were consistent with squamous metaplasia (keratins, SPRR), proinflammatory cytokine production (IL1β, CXCL5, and S100A7), and tissue remodeling (MMP7, MMP9, MMP12, and HAS3). There was no difference in the level of IFNγ between cases and controls. However, cases had increased INDO, NOS2A, and IL13RA2 and reduced IL13. C. trachomatis was detected in 1/772. Cases show evidence of ongoing inflammation and tissue remodeling, which were more marked where clinical inflammation was also present. Significantly, these processes appear to be active in the absence of current C. trachomatis infection. There was limited evidence of a TH1 response (INDO and NOS2A) and no association between a TH2 response and cases. The epithelium appears to be actively involved in late cicatricial stages of trachoma through the production of proinflammatory factors (IL1β, CXCL5, and S100A7). Longitudinal studies are needed to investigate which etiological factors and pathways are associated with progressive scarring and whether simply controlling chlamydial infection will halt progression in people with established cicatricial disease.
American Society for Microbiology