Current perspectives on the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

N Walter, HR Collard, TE King Jr - Proceedings of the American …, 2006 - atsjournals.org
N Walter, HR Collard, TE King Jr
Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society, 2006atsjournals.org
The clinical course of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is variable; however, the long-term
survival in IPF is poor. Prednisone has been the mainstay of therapy since its release for
clinical use in 1948. Recently, prednisone combined with azathioprine or cyclophosphamide
has been used. A number of other drug combinations have been tried with prednisone (eg,
methotrexate, colchicine, penicillamine, or cyclosporine) but have failed or are not well
tolerated by the patient. Few high quality, prospective, controlled clinical trials have been …
The clinical course of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is variable; however, the long-term survival in IPF is poor. Prednisone has been the mainstay of therapy since its release for clinical use in 1948. Recently, prednisone combined with azathioprine or cyclophosphamide has been used. A number of other drug combinations have been tried with prednisone (e.g., methotrexate, colchicine, penicillamine, or cyclosporine) but have failed or are not well tolerated by the patient. Few high quality, prospective, controlled clinical trials have been performed. Thus, there is no good evidence to support the routine use of any specific therapy in the management of IPF. Additional large clinical trials are needed to confirm the potential usefulness of the newer agents (e.g., IFN-γ1b, pirfenidone, N-acetylcysteine, coumadin, bosentan, or etanercept). This article examines the body of evidence supporting the current therapies and reviews the newer agents being tested in patients with IPF.
ATS Journals