Advantages of using the QIAshredder instead of restriction digestion to prepare DNA for droplet digital PCR

SA Yukl, P Kaiser, P Kim, P Li, JK Wong - Biotechniques, 2014 - Future Science
SA Yukl, P Kaiser, P Kim, P Li, JK Wong
Biotechniques, 2014Future Science
The viscosity of genomic DNA can interfere with digital PCR systems that partition samples
into oil droplets or microfluidic wells. Restriction digestion may reduce the viscosity, but the
process is labor-intensive, and the buffer can alter the conditions for PCR. DNA
fragmentation using the QIAshredder (a biopolymer spin column) is faster, may result in
more predictable and uniformly-sized fragments, and avoids the need for restriction buffers
that can inhibit downstream PCR. In 10 separate head-to-head experiments comparing …
The viscosity of genomic DNA can interfere with digital PCR systems that partition samples into oil droplets or microfluidic wells. Restriction digestion may reduce the viscosity, but the process is labor-intensive, and the buffer can alter the conditions for PCR. DNA fragmentation using the QIAshredder (a biopolymer spin column) is faster, may result in more predictable and uniformly-sized fragments, and avoids the need for restriction buffers that can inhibit downstream PCR. In 10 separate head-to-head experiments comparing aliquots of DNA processed using the QIAshredder to those digested with RsaI or BsaJI prior to droplet digital PCR, we found that the copy numbers measured from the QIAshredded DNA tended to be greater than those measured from the digested DNA (average of 1.35-fold compared with BsaJI; P < 0.0001), even for inputs as high as 1.8 µg or dilution down to the single copy level.
Future Science