[HTML][HTML] Cone photoreceptor cell segmentation and diameter measurement on adaptive optics images using circularly constrained active contour model

J Liu, HW Jung, A Dubra, J Tam - … ophthalmology & visual …, 2018 - jov.arvojournals.org
Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2018jov.arvojournals.org
Purpose: Cone photoreceptor cells can be noninvasively imaged in the living human eye by
using nonconfocal adaptive optics scanning ophthalmoscopy split detection. Existing
metrics, such as cone density and spacing, are based on simplifying cone photoreceptors to
single points. The purposes of this study were to introduce a computer-aided approach for
segmentation of cone photoreceptors, to apply this technique to create a normal database of
cone diameters, and to demonstrate its use in the context of existing metrics. Methods: Cone …
Abstract
Purpose: Cone photoreceptor cells can be noninvasively imaged in the living human eye by using nonconfocal adaptive optics scanning ophthalmoscopy split detection. Existing metrics, such as cone density and spacing, are based on simplifying cone photoreceptors to single points. The purposes of this study were to introduce a computer-aided approach for segmentation of cone photoreceptors, to apply this technique to create a normal database of cone diameters, and to demonstrate its use in the context of existing metrics.
Methods: Cone photoreceptor segmentation is achieved through a circularly constrained active contour model (CCACM). Circular templates and image gradients attract active contours toward cone photoreceptor boundaries. Automated segmentation from in vivo human subject data was compared to ground truth established by manual segmentation. Cone diameters computed from curated data (automated segmentation followed by manual removal of errors) were compared with histology and published data.
Results: Overall, there was good agreement between automated and manual segmentations and between diameter measurements (n= 5191 cones) and published histologic data across retinal eccentricities ranging from 1.35 to 6.35 mm (temporal). Interestingly, cone diameter was correlated to both cone density and cone spacing (negatively and positively, respectively; P< 0.01 for both). Application of the proposed automated segmentation to images from a patient with late-onset retinal degeneration revealed the presence of enlarged cones above individual reticular pseudodrusen (average 23.0% increase, P< 0.05).
Conclusions: CCACM can accurately segment cone photoreceptors on split detection images across a range of eccentricities. Metrics derived from this automated segmentation of adaptive optics retinal images can provide new insights into retinal diseases.
ARVO Journals