Validation of a cell-cycle progression gene panel to improve risk stratification in a contemporary prostatectomy cohort

MR Cooperberg, JP Simko, JE Cowan… - Journal of Clinical …, 2013 - escholarship.org
MR Cooperberg, JP Simko, JE Cowan, JE Reid, A Djalilvand, S Bhatnagar, A Gutin…
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2013escholarship.org
PurposeWe aimed to validate a previously described genetic risk score, denoted the cell-
cycle progression (CCP) score, in predicting contemporary radical prostatectomy (RP)
outcomes. MethodsRNA was quantified from paraffin-embedded RP specimens. The CCP
score was calculated as average expression of 31 CCP genes, normalized to 15
housekeeper genes. Recurrence was defined as two prostate-specific antigen levels≥ 0.2
ng/mL or any salvage treatment. Associations between CCP score and recurrence were …
PurposeWe aimed to validate a previously described genetic risk score, denoted the cell-cycle progression (CCP) score, in predicting contemporary radical prostatectomy (RP) outcomes.MethodsRNA was quantified from paraffin-embedded RP specimens. The CCP score was calculated as average expression of 31 CCP genes, normalized to 15 housekeeper genes. Recurrence was defined as two prostate-specific antigen levels ≥ 0.2 ng/mL or any salvage treatment. Associations between CCP score and recurrence were examined, with adjustment for clinical and pathologic variables using Cox proportional hazards regression and partial likelihood ratio tests. The CCP score was assessed for independent prognostic utility beyond a standard postoperative risk assessment (Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment post-Surgical [CAPRA-S] score), and a score combining CAPRA-S and CCP was validated.ResultsEighty-two (19.9%) of 413 men experienced recurrence. The hazard ratio (HR) for each unit increase in CCP score (range, -1.62 to 2.16) was 2.1 (95% CI, 1.6 to 2.9); with adjustment for CAPRA-S, the HR was 1.7 (95% CI, 1.3 to 2.4). The score was able to substratify patients with low clinical risk as defined by CAPRA-S ≤ 2 (HR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.4 to 3.7). Combining the CCP and CAPRA-S improved the concordance index for both the overall cohort and low-risk subset; the combined CAPRA-S + CCP score consistently predicted outcomes across the range of clinical risk. This combined score outperformed both individual scores on decision curve analysis.ConclusionThe CCP score was validated to have significant prognostic accuracy after controlling for all available clinical and pathologic data. The score may improve accuracy of risk stratification for men with clinically localized prostate cancer, including those with low-risk disease.
escholarship.org