Ex vivo lung perfusion to improve donor lung function and increase the number of organs available for transplantation

F Valenza, L Rosso, S Coppola, S Froio… - Transplant …, 2014 - Wiley Online Library
F Valenza, L Rosso, S Coppola, S Froio, A Palleschi, D Tosi, P Mendogni, V Salice…
Transplant International, 2014Wiley Online Library
This paper describes the initial clinical experience of ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) at the
Fondazione Ca'Granda in Milan between January 2011 and May 2013. EVLP was
considered if donor PaO2/FiO2 was below 300 mmHg or if lung function was doubtful.
Donors with massive lung contusion, aspiration, purulent secretions, pneumonia, or sepsis
were excluded. EVLP was run with a low‐flow, open atrium and low hematocrit technique.
Thirty‐five lung transplants from brain death donors were performed, seven of which after …
Summary
This paper describes the initial clinical experience of ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) at the Fondazione Ca’ Granda in Milan between January 2011 and May 2013. EVLP was considered if donor PaO2/FiO2 was below 300 mmHg or if lung function was doubtful. Donors with massive lung contusion, aspiration, purulent secretions, pneumonia, or sepsis were excluded. EVLP was run with a low‐flow, open atrium and low hematocrit technique. Thirty‐five lung transplants from brain death donors were performed, seven of which after EVLP. EVLP donors were older (54 ± 9 years vs. 40 ± 15 years, EVLP versus Standard, P < 0.05), had lower PaO2/FiO2 (264 ± 78 mmHg vs. 453 ± 119 mmHg, P < 0.05), and more chest X‐ray abnormalities (P < 0.05). EVLP recipients were more often admitted to intensive care unit as urgent cases (57% vs. 18%, P = 0.05); lung allocation score at transplantation was higher (79 [40–84] vs. 39 [36–46], P < 0.05). After transplantation, primary graft dysfunction (PGD72 grade 3, 32% vs. 28%, EVLP versus Standard, P = 1), mortality at 30 days (0% vs. 0%, P = 1), and overall survival (71% vs. 86%, EVLP versus Standard P = 0.27) were not different between groups. EVLP enabled a 20% increase in available donor organs and resulted in successful transplants with lungs that would have otherwise been rejected (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT01967953).
Wiley Online Library