The Prognostic Value of Fasting Plasma Glucose, Two-Hour Postload Glucose, and HbA1c in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Report From EUROASPIRE IV …

B Shahim, D De Bacquer, G De Backer… - Diabetes …, 2017 - Am Diabetes Assoc
B Shahim, D De Bacquer, G De Backer, V Gyberg, K Kotseva, L Mellbin, O Schnell…
Diabetes care, 2017Am Diabetes Assoc
OBJECTIVE Three tests are recommended for identifying dysglycemia: fasting glucose
(FPG), 2-h postload glucose (2h-PG) from an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), and
glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). This study explored the prognostic value of these
screening tests in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). RESEARCH DESIGN AND
METHODS FPG, 2h-PG, and HbA1c were used to screen 4,004 CAD patients without a
history of diabetes (age 18–80 years) for dysglycemia. The prognostic value of these tests …
OBJECTIVE
Three tests are recommended for identifying dysglycemia: fasting glucose (FPG), 2-h postload glucose (2h-PG) from an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), and glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). This study explored the prognostic value of these screening tests in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
FPG, 2h-PG, and HbA1c were used to screen 4,004 CAD patients without a history of diabetes (age 18–80 years) for dysglycemia. The prognostic value of these tests was studied after 2 years of follow-up. The primary end point included cardiovascular mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure and a secondary end point of incident diabetes.
RESULTS
Complete information including all three glycemic parameters was available in 3,775 patients (94.3%), of whom 246 (6.5%) experienced the primary end point. Neither FPG nor HbA1c predicted the primary outcome, whereas the 2h-PG, dichotomized as <7.8 vs. ≥7.8 mmol/L, was a significant predictor (hazard ratio 1.38, 95% CI 1.07–1.78; P = 0.01). During follow-up, diabetes developed in 78 of the 2,609 patients (3.0%) without diabetes at baseline. An FPG between 6.1 and 6.9 mmol/L did not predict incident diabetes, whereas HbA1c 5.7–6.5% and 2h-PG 7.8–11.0 mmol/L were both significant independent predictors.
CONCLUSIONS
The 2h-PG, in contrast to FPG and HbA1c, provides significant prognostic information regarding cardiovascular events in patients with CAD. Furthermore, elevated 2h-PG and HbA1c are significant prognostic indicators of an increased risk of incident diabetes.
Am Diabetes Assoc