Concomitant use of antiplatelet therapy with dabigatran or warfarin in the Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy (RE-LY) trial

AL Dans, SJ Connolly, L Wallentin, S Yang… - Circulation, 2013 - Am Heart Assoc
AL Dans, SJ Connolly, L Wallentin, S Yang, J Nakamya, M Brueckmann, M Ezekowitz…
Circulation, 2013Am Heart Assoc
Background—The Randomized Evaluation of Long-term Anticoagulation Therapy (RE-LY)
trial showed that dabigatran etexilate 150 mg BID was superior and dabigatran etexilate 110
mg BID was noninferior to warfarin in preventing stroke and systemic embolism in patients
with atrial fibrillation. In this subgroup analysis, we assess the efficacy and safety of
dabigatran in patients who did and did not receive concomitant antiplatelets. Methods and
Results—All comparisons used a Cox proportional hazards model with adjustments made …
Background
The Randomized Evaluation of Long-term Anticoagulation Therapy (RE-LY) trial showed that dabigatran etexilate 150 mg BID was superior and dabigatran etexilate 110 mg BID was noninferior to warfarin in preventing stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation. In this subgroup analysis, we assess the efficacy and safety of dabigatran in patients who did and did not receive concomitant antiplatelets.
Methods and Results
All comparisons used a Cox proportional hazards model with adjustments made for risk factors for bleeding. A time-dependent analysis was performed when comparing patients with concomitant antiplatelets with those without. Of 18 113 patients, 6952 (38.4%) received concomitant aspirin or clopidogrel at some time during the study. Dabigatran etexilate 110 mg BID was noninferior to warfarin in reducing stroke and systemic embolism, whether patients received antiplatelets (hazard ratio [HR], 0.93; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.70–1.25) or not (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.66–1.15; interaction P=0.738). There were fewer major bleeds than warfarin in both subgroups (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.67–1.00 for patients who used antiplatelets; HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.64–0.96 for patients who did not; interaction P=0.794). Dabigatran etexilate 150 mg BID reduced the primary outcome of stroke and systemic embolism in comparison with warfarin. This effect seemed attenuated among patients who used antiplatelets (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.59–1.08) in comparison with those who did not (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.38–0.72; P for interaction=0.058). Major bleeding was similar to warfarin regardless of antiplatelet use (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.76–1.12 for patients who used antiplatelets; HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.78–1.15 for patients who did not; P for interaction=0.875). In the time-dependent analysis, concomitant use of a single antiplatelet seemed to increase the risk of major bleeding (HR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.42–1.82). Dual antiplatelet seemed to increased this even more (HR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.79–2.98). The absolute risks were lowest on dabigatran etexilate 110 mg BID in comparison with dabigatran etexilate 150 mg BID or warfarin.
Conclusions
Concomitant antiplatelet drugs appeared to increase the risk for major bleeding in RE-LY without affecting the advantages of dabigatran over warfarin. Choosing between dabigatran etexilate 110 mg BID and dabigatran etexilate 150 mg BID requires a careful assessment of characteristics that influence the balance between benefit and harm.
Clinical Trial Registration
URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00262600.
Am Heart Assoc