Submit a comment
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is a lethal brain tumor containing a subpopulation of GBM stem cells (GSCs) that interaction with surrounding cells, including infiltrating tumor-associated macrophages and microglia (TAMs). While GSCs and TAMs are in close proximity and likely interact to coordinate tumor growth, a limited number of mechanisms have been identified that support their communication. Here, we identified glycoprotein NMB (GPNMB) as a key factor mediating a unique bidirectional interaction between GSCs and TAMs in GBM. Specifically, GSCs educated macrophages and microglia to preferentially express GPNMB in the GBM tumor microenvironment. As a result, TAM-secreted GPNMB interacted with its receptor CD44 on GSCs to promote their glycolytic and self-renewal abilities via activating the PYK2/RSK2 signaling axis. Disrupting GPNMB-mediated GSC-TAM interplay suppressed tumor progression and self-renewal in GBM mouse models. Our study found a protumor function of GPNMB-mediated GSC-TAM bidirectional communication and supports GPNMB as a promising therapeutic target for GBM.
Authors
Yang Liu, Lizhi Pang, Fatima Khan, Junyan Wu, Fei Zhou, Craig Horbinski, Shideng Bao, Jennifer S. Yu, Justin D. Lathia, Peiwen Chen
Guidelines
The Editorial Board will only consider comments that are deemed relevant and of interest to readers. The Journal will not post data that have not been subjected to peer review; or a comment that is essentially a reiteration of another comment.
- Comments appear on the Journal’s website and are linked from the original article’s web page.
- Authors are notified by email if their comments are posted.
- The Journal reserves the right to edit comments for length and clarity.
- No appeals will be considered.
- Comments are not indexed in PubMed.
Specific requirements
- Maximum length, 400 words
- Entered as plain text or HTML
- Author’s name and email address, to be posted with the comment
- Declaration of all potential conflicts of interest (even if these are not ultimately posted); see the Journal’s conflict-of-interest policy
- Comments may not include figures
