Submit a comment
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies have demonstrated the role of ghrelin in alcohol-related behaviors and consumption. Blockade of the growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHSR), which is the ghrelin receptor, has been shown to decrease alcohol drinking and reward-related behaviors across several animal models. We previously conducted a human study testing a GHSR inverse agonist/competitive antagonist, PF-5190457, in individuals who are heavy drinkers and showed its safety when coadministered with alcohol. Here, we conducted a phase IIa experimental medicine study in patients with alcohol use disorder (AUD) to investigate the effects of PF-5190457 on alcohol- and food-related outcomes.METHODS Forty-two individuals with AUD (n = 29 completers) participated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study where they received PF-5190457 100mg b.i.d. (or placebo) in 2 counterbalanced, within-subject stages. Participants completed an alcohol cue-reactivity (CR) experiment in a bar-like laboratory and a virtual food choice experiment in a cafeteria-like virtual reality (VR) environment. A subset of participants (n = 12) performed a CR task during a brain functional MRI (fMRI) experiment.RESULTS PF-5190457 did not reduce cue-elicited alcohol craving. PF-5190457 reduced virtual calories selected (P = 0.04) in the VR environment. PF-5190457 did not influence neural activation during CR task in the fMRI experiment.CONCLUSION This study provides human evidence of the role of GHSR blockade in behaviors related to food selection and highlights the need for future investigations into targeting the ghrelin system in AUD.TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov (accession no. NCT02707055).FUNDING NIDA and NIAAA ZIA-DA000635; National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences UH2/UH3-TR000963.
Authors
Monica L. Faulkner, Mehdi Farokhnia, Mary R. Lee, Lisa Farinelli, Brittney D. Browning, Kelly Abshire, Allison M. Daurio, Vikas Munjal, Sara L. Deschaine, Selim R. Boukabara, Christopher Fortney, Garrick Sherman, Melanie Schwandt, Fatemeh Akhlaghi, Reza Momenan, Thomas J. Ross, Susan Persky, Lorenzo Leggio
Guidelines
The Editorial Board will only consider comments that are deemed relevant and of interest to readers. The Journal will not post data that have not been subjected to peer review; or a comment that is essentially a reiteration of another comment.
- Comments appear on the Journal’s website and are linked from the original article’s web page.
- Authors are notified by email if their comments are posted.
- The Journal reserves the right to edit comments for length and clarity.
- No appeals will be considered.
- Comments are not indexed in PubMed.
Specific requirements
- Maximum length, 400 words
- Entered as plain text or HTML
- Author’s name and email address, to be posted with the comment
- Declaration of all potential conflicts of interest (even if these are not ultimately posted); see the Journal’s conflict-of-interest policy
- Comments may not include figures
