Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Parasympathetic dysfunction and antiarrhythmic effect of vagal nerve stimulation following myocardial infarction
Marmar Vaseghi, Siamak Salavatian, Pradeep S. Rajendran, Daigo Yagishita, William R. Woodward, David Hamon, Kentaro Yamakawa, Tadanobu Irie, Beth A. Habecker, Kalyanam Shivkumar
Marmar Vaseghi, Siamak Salavatian, Pradeep S. Rajendran, Daigo Yagishita, William R. Woodward, David Hamon, Kentaro Yamakawa, Tadanobu Irie, Beth A. Habecker, Kalyanam Shivkumar
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Cardiology

Parasympathetic dysfunction and antiarrhythmic effect of vagal nerve stimulation following myocardial infarction

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Myocardial infarction causes sympathetic activation and parasympathetic dysfunction, which increase risk of sudden death due to ventricular arrhythmias. Mechanisms underlying parasympathetic dysfunction are unclear. The aim of this study was to delineate consequences of myocardial infarction on parasympathetic myocardial neurotransmitter levels and the function of parasympathetic cardiac ganglia neurons, and to assess electrophysiological effects of vagal nerve stimulation on ventricular arrhythmias in a chronic porcine infarct model. While norepinephrine levels decreased, cardiac acetylcholine levels remained preserved in border zones and viable myocardium of infarcted hearts. In vivo neuronal recordings demonstrated abnormalities in firing frequency of parasympathetic neurons of infarcted animals. Neurons that were activated by parasympathetic stimulation had low basal firing frequency, while neurons that were suppressed by left vagal nerve stimulation had abnormally high basal activity. Myocardial infarction increased sympathetic inputs to parasympathetic convergent neurons. However, the underlying parasympathetic cardiac neuronal network remained intact. Augmenting parasympathetic drive with vagal nerve stimulation reduced ventricular arrhythmia inducibility by decreasing ventricular excitability and heterogeneity of repolarization of infarct border zones, an area with known proarrhythmic potential. Preserved acetylcholine levels and intact parasympathetic neuronal pathways can explain the electrical stabilization of infarct border zones with vagal nerve stimulation, providing insight into its antiarrhythmic benefit.

Authors

Marmar Vaseghi, Siamak Salavatian, Pradeep S. Rajendran, Daigo Yagishita, William R. Woodward, David Hamon, Kentaro Yamakawa, Tadanobu Irie, Beth A. Habecker, Kalyanam Shivkumar

×

Figure 5

Electrophysiological response to VNS.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Electrophysiological response to VNS.
(A) Examples of unipolar electrogr...
(A) Examples of unipolar electrograms obtained from the sock electrode and used for ARI analysis from normal hearts and from viable, border zone, and scar regions of infarcted hearts are shown. (B) Global ARI (mean ARI from all 56 electrodes) in normal animals (n = 12 animals) increased with VNS (left panel, P < 0.01, Wilcoxon signed rank test). Example of a polar map (right panel) from 1 normal animal shows that increases were observed in all regions. (C) The global ARI in infarcted hearts (n = 18 animals) also significantly increased with VNS (left panel, P < 0.01, Wilcoxon signed rank test). Example of polar maps obtained from 1 infarcted animal is shown (right panel). In infarcted hearts, VNS has a significant impact on regional ARIs, particularly noticeable along peri-infarct regions (location of scar is marked with dashed lines on the polar maps of this animal). (D) Scar regions, at baseline, demonstrated the greatest mean ARI (**P < 0.001, linear mixed effects model, n = 18 infarcted animals). In addition, all regions, even scar, demonstrate a significant increase in mean ARI from baseline (*P < 0.01, linear mixed effects model, n = 18 infarcted animals). Furthermore, when the percentage increase in ARI with VNS is compared across various regions of infarcted hearts, consistent with the ACh findings, scar shows the least response compared with viable and border zone regions (§P < 0.01, linear mixed effects model, n = 18 infarcted animals). However, as with ACh results, there was no statistical difference in the response to VNS of scar compared with normal hearts (¥P = 0.1, linear mixed effects model, n = 18 infarcted animals). ARI, activation recovery interval; MI, myocardial infarction; VNS, vagal nerve stimulation; LV, left ventricle.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts