Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Molecular underpinnings of metastatic small renal masses
Payal Kapur, Daria Beshnova, Hua Zhong, Ruby Sharma, Pooja Ghatalia, Angela Yoo, Daniel D. Le, Ratna Mukhopadhyay, Alana Christie, Jeffrey Miyata, Shuanzeng Wei, Rana R. McKay, Dinesh Rakheja, Satwik Rajaram, Robert G. Uzzo, A. Ari Hakimi, Zora Modrusan, James Brugarolas
Payal Kapur, Daria Beshnova, Hua Zhong, Ruby Sharma, Pooja Ghatalia, Angela Yoo, Daniel D. Le, Ratna Mukhopadhyay, Alana Christie, Jeffrey Miyata, Shuanzeng Wei, Rana R. McKay, Dinesh Rakheja, Satwik Rajaram, Robert G. Uzzo, A. Ari Hakimi, Zora Modrusan, James Brugarolas
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Clinical Research Genetics Oncology

Molecular underpinnings of metastatic small renal masses

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Metastases in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) typically arise from large primary tumors. However, a subset of patients with small renal masses (SRMs; ≤4 cm) can develop metastatic disease. Identifying these tumors is clinically important, as many SRMs are managed with active surveillance, and their study may provide insight into the early acquisition of metastatic competence. It remains unclear whether these tumors acquire distinct metastatic programs or instead show premature activation of the same aggressive programs typically associated with larger tumors. Here, we performed integrated morphological and molecular profiling of a multiinstitutional cohort of metastatic SRMs, including whole-exome sequencing and RNA-Seq, using nonmetastatic primary tumors as controls. Among metastatic, non–clear cell SRMs, we identified NF2-altered tumors, ELOC-mutated RCC, and an mTOR-driven eosinophilic vacuolated tumor. Metastatic clear cell SRMs were enriched by multi-hit aggressive genotypes, including recurrent losses of chromosomes 8p, 9, and 14q, as well as co-occurring driver alterations (≥2 events), including BAP1 and mTOR pathway genes. Transcriptomic analyses revealed enrichment of the non-negative matrix factorization 3 (NMF3) subtype from the IMmotion151 trial-based taxonomy, along with metabolic rewiring and reduced cytotoxic immune effector function. Collectively, these findings identify molecular programs associated with metastatic competence in SRMs, highlight the importance of genomic studies of equivocal non-clear cell SRMs, and provide a biological framework for risk stratification in patients often considered for active surveillance.

Authors

Payal Kapur, Daria Beshnova, Hua Zhong, Ruby Sharma, Pooja Ghatalia, Angela Yoo, Daniel D. Le, Ratna Mukhopadhyay, Alana Christie, Jeffrey Miyata, Shuanzeng Wei, Rana R. McKay, Dinesh Rakheja, Satwik Rajaram, Robert G. Uzzo, A. Ari Hakimi, Zora Modrusan, James Brugarolas

×

Figure 3

SRM-MccRCC retains canonical ccRCC drivers but is enriched for multi-hit genomic alterations and metastasis-associated copy-number losses.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
SRM-MccRCC retains canonical ccRCC drivers but is enriched for multi-hit...
(A) Integrated oncoplot of SRM-MccRCC (n = 59) and control tumors (n = 19) showing somatic (nonsynonymous) mutations and arm-level copy-number alterations, annotated by metastasis status, tissue type (tumor vs. thrombus), and normal reference type. For each alteration, the percentage on the left in blue represents its frequency in Control-NMccRCC tumors, whereas the percentage shown in parentheses on the right in red represents its frequency in SRM-MccRCC tumors. (B) Copy-number gain/loss frequency between SRM-MccRCC and control tumors. (C) Bar plot of selected recurrent alterations shows increased frequencies of 8p/9p/9q/14q loss, mTOR pathway, and BAP1 alterations in SRM-MccRCC relative to controls. (D) Distribution of the number of metastatic driver alterations per tumor. The boxed percentages summarize the proportions of tumors with 0–1 driver alterations and 2–5 driver alterations, respectively. (E) Pairwise co-occurrence/mutual exclusivity matrix of major driver events. LOH, loss of heterozygosity; M, metastasis; T, primary tumor; Th, tumor thrombus.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts