Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Minimalistic transcriptomic signatures permit accurate early prediction of COVID-19 mortality
Rithwik Narendra, et al.
Rithwik Narendra, et al.
View: Text | PDF
Clinical Research and Public Health Infectious disease Pulmonology

Minimalistic transcriptomic signatures permit accurate early prediction of COVID-19 mortality

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

BACKGROUND Accurate prognostic assays for COVID-19 represent an unmet clinical need. We sought to identify and validate early parsimonious transcriptomic signatures that accurately predict fatal outcomes.METHODS We studied 894 patients enrolled in the prospective, multicenter Immunophenotyping Assessment in a COVID-19 Cohort (IMPACC) with peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and nasal swabs collected within 48 hours of admission. Host gene expression was measured with RNA-Seq. We trained parsimonious prognostic classifiers incorporating host gene expression, age, and SARS-CoV-2 viral load to predict 28-day mortality in 70% of the cohort. Classifier performance was determined in the remaining 30% and externally validated in a contemporary COVID-19 cohort (n = 137) with vaccinated patients.RESULTS Fatal COVID-19 was characterized by 4,189 differentially expressed genes in the peripheral blood. A COVID-specific 3-gene peripheral blood classifier (CD83, ATP1B2, DAAM2) combined with age and SARS-CoV-2 viral load achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.88 (95% CI, 0.82–0.94). A 3-gene nasal classifier (SLC5A5, CD200R1, FCER1A), in comparison, yielded an AUC of 0.74 (95% CI, 0.64–0.83). Notably, OLAH, the most strongly upregulated gene in both PBMC and nasal swab and recently implicated in severe viral infection pathogenesis, yielded AUCs of 0.86 (0.79–0.93) and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.69–0.86), respectively. Both peripheral blood classifiers demonstrated comparable performance in an independent contemporary cohort of vaccinated patients (AUCs 0.74–0.80).CONCLUSION Our parsimonious blood- and nasal-based classifiers accurately predicted COVID-19 mortality and merit further study as accessible prognostic tools to guide triage, resource allocation, and early therapeutic interventions.FUNDING NIH: 5R01AI135803-03, R35HL140026, 5U19AI118608-04, 5U19AI128910-04, 4U19AI090023-11, 4U19AI118610-06, R01AI145835-01A1S1, 5U19AI062629-17, 5U19AI057229-17, 5U19AI125357-05, 5U19AI128913-03, 3U19AI077439-13, 5U54AI142766-03, 5R01AI104870-07, 3U19AI089992-09, 3U19AI128913-03, 5T32DA018926-18, and K0826161611. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIH: 3U19AI1289130, U19AI128913-04S1, and R01AI122220. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, NIH: UM1TR004528. The National Science Foundation: DMS2310836. The Chan Zuckerberg Biohub San Francisco.

Authors

Rithwik Narendra, Emily C. Lydon, Hoang Van Phan, Natasha Spottiswoode, Lucile P. Neyton, Joann Diray-Arce, IMPACC Network, COMET Consortium, EARLI Consortium, Patrice M. Becker, Seunghee Kim-Schulze, Annmarie Hoch, Harry Pickering, Patrick van Zalm, Charles B. Cairns, Matthew C. Altman, Alison D. Augustine, Steve Bosinger, Walter Eckalbar, Leying Guan, Naresh Doni Jayavelu, Steven H. Kleinstein, Florian Krammer, Holden T. Maecker, Al Ozonoff, Bjoern Peters, Nadine Rouphael, Ruth R. Montgomery, Elaine Reed, Joanna Schaenman, Hanno Steen, Ofer Levy, Sidney C. Haller, David Erle, Carolyn M. Hendrickson, Matthew F. Krummel, Michael A. Matthay, Prescott Woodruff, Elias K. Haddad, Carolyn S. Calfee, Charles R. Langelier

×
Problems with a PDF?

This file is in Adobe Acrobat (PDF) format. If you have not installed and configured the Adobe Acrobat Reader on your system.

Having trouble reading a PDF?

PDFs are designed to be printed out and read, but if you prefer to read them online, you may find it easier if you increase the view size to 125%.

Having trouble saving a PDF?

Many versions of the free Acrobat Reader do not allow Save. You must instead save the PDF from the JCI Online page you downloaded it from. PC users: Right-click on the Download link and choose the option that says something like "Save Link As...". Mac users should hold the mouse button down on the link to get these same options.

Having trouble printing a PDF?

  1. Try printing one page at a time or to a newer printer.
  2. Try saving the file to disk before printing rather than opening it "on the fly." This requires that you configure your browser to "Save" rather than "Launch Application" for the file type "application/pdf", and can usually be done in the "Helper Applications" options.
  3. Make sure you are using the latest version of Adobe's Acrobat Reader.

ICMJE disclosure forms - Download (2.30 MB)

Advertisement

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts