Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Development and evaluation of a symposium model for building physician-scientist skills, connections, and persistence
Kevin F. Dowling, Shohini K. Ghosh-Choudhary, Neil Carleton, Kathleen Prigg, Richard A. Steinman
Kevin F. Dowling, Shohini K. Ghosh-Choudhary, Neil Carleton, Kathleen Prigg, Richard A. Steinman
View: Text | PDF
Physician-Scientist Development

Development and evaluation of a symposium model for building physician-scientist skills, connections, and persistence

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

High rates of physician-scientist attrition from the investigative workforce remain a significant problem despite the development of dedicated programs and initiatives designed to address the unique challenges faced by physician-scientists. However, many of these efforts are restricted to single career stages of physician-scientist training or to a single medical specialty, which may limit opportunities for beneficial vertical and horizontal mentorship regarding overcoming common career obstacles. Here, we outline the development of a physician-scientist symposium to break down silos and enable productive interactions between physician-scientists across career/training stages, academic and scientific disciplines, and medical specialties. Participants were (a) mixed in small-group problem-based discussions, (b) participated in a cross-specialty keynote panel on overcoming barriers in a physician-scientist career, and (c) took part in skill-building workshops. Attendees indicated that they fostered new connections, developed new skills to overcome career challenges, and increased their commitment to persevering in a career as a physician-scientist. Positive evaluations were not dependent on attendee career/training stage or gender. We suggest these elements of the symposium curriculum may be easily adapted for inclusion in a wide variety of physician-scientist training formats.

Authors

Kevin F. Dowling, Shohini K. Ghosh-Choudhary, Neil Carleton, Kathleen Prigg, Richard A. Steinman

×

Figure 2

Perception of the global value of the physician-scientist symposium.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Perception of the global value of the physician-scientist symposium.
(A)...
(A) Perceived value of the symposium overall to survey respondents as a function of training or career stage (Stage, x axis) and for self-reported gender (rows). (B) Perceived value of the symposium components (columns) to survey respondents as a function of training or career stage and for self-reported gender (rows). Likelihood ratio (LR) χ2 test statistics and q values for each predictor in (A) proportional odds logistic regression analysis or (B) cumulative logit-linked mixed-effects models are listed, separated by offsets between graphs. Results are reported as the proportion of Likert scale responses (y axis) in each training or career stage category (x axis). For each subcolumn, proportions reported as percentages are provided as inset labels for each Likert response.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts