Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Variation in HIV-1 Tat activity is a key determinant in the establishment of latent infection
Francisco Gomez-Rivera, … , Marianne E. Yaple-Maresh, Kathleen L. Collins
Francisco Gomez-Rivera, … , Marianne E. Yaple-Maresh, Kathleen L. Collins
Published December 5, 2024
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2025;10(2):e184711. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.184711.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Infectious disease Virology

Variation in HIV-1 Tat activity is a key determinant in the establishment of latent infection

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Despite effective treatment, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) persists in optimally treated people as a transcriptionally silent provirus. Latently infected cells evade the immune system and the harmful effects of the virus, thereby creating a long-lasting reservoir of HIV. To gain a deeper insight into the molecular mechanisms of HIV latency establishment, we constructed a series of HIV-1 fluorescent reporter viruses that distinguish active versus latent infection. We unexpectedly observed that the proportion of active to latent infection depended on a limiting viral factor, which created a bottleneck that could be overcome by superinfection of the cell, T cell activation, or overexpression of HIV-1 transactivator of transcription (Tat). In addition, we found that tat and regulator of expression of virion proteins (Rev) expression levels varied among HIV molecular clones and that tat levels were an important variable in latency establishment. Lower rev levels limited viral protein expression whereas lower Tat levels or mutation of the Tat binding element promoted latent infection that was resistant to reactivation even in fully activated primary T cells. Nevertheless, we found that combinations of latency reversal agents targeting both cellular activation and histone acetylation pathways overcame deficiencies in the Tat/TAR axis of transcription regulation. These results provide additional insight into the mechanisms of latency establishment and inform Tat-centered approaches to cure HIV.

Authors

Francisco Gomez-Rivera, Valeri H. Terry, Cuie Chen, Mark M. Painter, Maria C. Virgilio, Marianne E. Yaple-Maresh, Kathleen L. Collins

×

Figure 7

Overexpression of HIV tat dramatically reduces the impact of viral inoculum on latency establishment.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Overexpression of HIV tat dramatically reduces the impact of viral inocu...
(A) Diagram for lentivirus encoding HIV spliced tat and puromycin resistance gene (51). (B) Schematic of the experimental process for panels C–H. (C, E, and G) Representative flow cytometric plots of CEM-SS cells stably expressing lentiviral vectors as indicated and transduced with indicated reporter virus according to the timeline shown in B. (D, F, and H) Summary graphs of flow cytometric analysis of CEM-SS cells stably expressing lentiviral vectors as indicated and transduced with increasing amounts of the indicated reporter virus according to the timeline shown in B. Each point represents a technical replicate from 3 independent experiments: SS, parental CEM-SS cells; EV, CEM-SS cells stably expressing the empty lentiviral vector; tat89.6, CEM-SS stably expressing a lentiviral vector containing tat as in A. (I) Schematic demonstrating the experimental process for panel J. (J) Flow cytometric analysis of CEM-SS cells transduced with 89.6 VT1, sorted for latently infected cells (GFP+mCherry–), and then transduced with the indicated lentiviral vector according to the timeline shown in I. Similar results were obtained in 3 independent experiments. For D, F, and H, statistical significance was determined by Deming (Model II) linear regression, ****P ≤ 0.0001.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts