Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Tregs integrate native and CAR-mediated costimulatory signals for control of allograft rejection
Isaac Rosado-Sánchez, … , Giorgio Raimondi, Megan K. Levings
Isaac Rosado-Sánchez, … , Giorgio Raimondi, Megan K. Levings
Published September 5, 2023
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2023;8(19):e167215. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.167215.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Immunology Transplantation

Tregs integrate native and CAR-mediated costimulatory signals for control of allograft rejection

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Tregs expressing chimeric antigen receptors (CAR-Tregs) are a promising tool to promote transplant tolerance. The relationship between CAR structure and Treg function was studied in xenogeneic, immunodeficient mice, revealing advantages of CD28-encoding CARs. However, these models could underrepresent interactions between CAR-Tregs, antigen-presenting cells (APCs), and donor-specific Abs. We generated Tregs expressing HLA-A2–specific CARs with different costimulatory domains and compared their function in vitro and in vivo using an immunocompetent model of transplantation. In vitro, the CD28-encoding CAR had superior antigen-specific suppression, proliferation, and cytokine production. In contrast, in vivo, Tregs expressing CARs encoding CD28, ICOS, programmed cell death 1, and GITR, but not 4-1BB or OX40, all extended skin allograft survival. To reconcile in vitro and in vivo data, we analyzed effects of a CAR encoding CD3ζ but no costimulatory domain. These data revealed that exogenous costimulation from APCs can compensate for the lack of a CAR-encoded CD28 domain. Thus, Tregs expressing a CAR with or without CD28 are functionally equivalent in vivo, mediating similar extension of skin allograft survival and controlling the generation of anti–HLA-A2 alloantibodies. This study reveals a dimension of CAR-Treg biology and has important implications for the design of CARs for clinical use in Tregs.

Authors

Isaac Rosado-Sánchez, Manjurul Haque, Kevin Salim, Madeleine Speck, Vivian C.W. Fung, Dominic A. Boardman, Majid Mojibian, Giorgio Raimondi, Megan K. Levings

×

Figure 4

A CAR costimulatory domain is dispensable for CAR-Tregs in vivo.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
A CAR costimulatory domain is dispensable for CAR-Tregs in vivo.
(A) Sch...
(A) Schematic diagram of the first- and second-generation CARs used. Tregs expressing the indicated CARs were stained with CPDe450 and cocultured with HLA-A2+ K562 cells for 3 days. (B) The percentage of CAR-Tregs that divided, determined by CPDeF450 dilution (left); n = 12–20 replicates from at least 5 independent experiments; and IL-10 secretion (right), measured in culture supernatants; n = 5–7 replicates from at least 3 independent experiments. (C) CAR-Tregs were cocultured with OTII CD4+ T cells at varying ratios in the presence of irradiated HLA-A2+ splenocytes and OVA peptide. CAR-Tregs mediated suppression of the OTII CD4+ T cell proliferation, as determined by Ki67 expression; n = 3–6 replicates from at least 2 independent experiments. UT, untransduced. (D–H) BL/6 mice were transplanted with skin grafts from syngeneic or HLA-A2+ BL/6 mice and administered 1 × 106 CAR-Tregs i.v. (D) Skin graft survival curves and (E) levels of anti–HLA-A2 IgG Abs from mice infused with Tregs expressing first- and second-generation CARs. (F) Persistence of CAR-Tregs measured as the percentage of Thy1.1+ CAR-Tregs of total CD45+ T cells in peripheral blood over time. (G and H) CAR-Treg expression of (G) CAR (c-Myc+) and (H) FoxP3 and FoxP3 and Helios. In vivo data pooled from 3 individual experiments with n = 3–13 mice per group. Data are reported as mean ± SEM. Data from the A2.28z, HER2.28z, and UT conditions are also shown in Figure 2, C and E, and Figure 3, A, B, and E–G. Statistical significance was determined using (B) 1-way or (C and E–H) 2-way ANOVA with a (C and E) Holm-Šidak posttest or (D) log-rank Mantel-Cox test. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001. Co-stim, costimulatory; UT, untransduced.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts