Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Reviews
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Top read articles
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Concise Communication
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Tumor cells fail to present MHC-II–restricted epitopes derived from oncogenes to CD4+ T cells
Spencer E. Brightman, … , Aaron M. Miller, Stephen P. Schoenberger
Spencer E. Brightman, … , Aaron M. Miller, Stephen P. Schoenberger
Published December 13, 2022
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2023;8(2):e165570. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.165570.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Immunology Oncology

Tumor cells fail to present MHC-II–restricted epitopes derived from oncogenes to CD4+ T cells

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

CD4+ T cells play a critical role in antitumor immunity via recognition of peptide antigens presented on MHC class II (MHC-II). Although some solid cancers can be induced to express MHC-II, the extent to which this enables direct recognition by tumor-specific CD4+ T cells is unclear. We isolated and characterized T cell antigen receptors (TCRs) from naturally primed CD4+ T cells specific for 2 oncoproteins, HPV-16 E6 and the activating KRASG12V mutation, from patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, respectively, and determined their ability to recognize autologous or human leukocyte antigen–matched antigen-expressing tumor cells. We found in both cases that the TCRs were capable of recognizing peptide-loaded target cells expressing the relevant MHC-II or B cell antigen-presenting cells (APCs) when the antigens were endogenously expressed and directed to the endosomal pathway but failed to recognize tumor cells expressing the source protein even after induction of surface MHC-II expression by IFN-γ or transduction with CIITA. These results suggest that priming and functional recognition of both a nuclear (E6) and a membrane-associated (KRAS) oncoprotein are predominantly confined to crosspresenting APCs rather than via direct recognition of tumor cells induced to express MHC-II.

Authors

Spencer E. Brightman, Martin S. Naradikian, Rukman R. Thota, Angelica Becker, Leslie Montero, Milad Bahmanof, Ashmitaa Logandha Ramamoorthy Premlal, Jason A. Greenbaum, Bjoern Peters, Ezra E.W. Cohen, Aaron M. Miller, Stephen P. Schoenberger

×

Figure 1

Identification of E6-reactive CD4+ and CD8+ TILs from HPV-16+ HNSCC.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Identification of E6-reactive CD4+ and CD8+ TILs from HPV-16+ HNSCC.
(A)...
(A) IFN-γ ELISPOT assay results from TILs derived from different tumor fragment cultures stimulated with indicated peptide pools at 5 μg/mL or 5 μg/mL phytohemagglutinin-L (PHA-L) as a positive control. Data represent the average of 3 technical replicates in a single experiment. SFC, spot-forming cells. (B) Cytokine secretion assay results from TIL fragments with ELISPOT reactivity demonstrating IFN-γ and IL-5 production from both CD8+ and CD4+ T cell subsets after stimulation with 1 μg/mL of the indicated peptide pools. TIL subsets with E6-specific IFN-γ production greater than DMSO controls (designated with bolded gates) were sorted for TCR sequencing.

Copyright © 2023 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts