Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Reviews
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Top read articles
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Concise Communication
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Augmenting chemotherapy with low-dose decitabine through an immune-independent mechanism
Wade R. Gutierrez, … , Varun Monga, Rebecca D. Dodd
Wade R. Gutierrez, … , Varun Monga, Rebecca D. Dodd
Published October 13, 2022
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2022;7(22):e159419. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.159419.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Oncology

Augmenting chemotherapy with low-dose decitabine through an immune-independent mechanism

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

The DNA methyltransferase inhibitor decitabine has classically been used to reactivate silenced genes and as a pretreatment for anticancer therapies. In a variation of this idea, this study explores the concept of adding low-dose decitabine (DAC) following administration of chemotherapy to bolster therapeutic efficacy. We find that addition of DAC following treatment with the chemotherapy agent gemcitabine improves survival and slows tumor growth in a mouse model of high-grade sarcoma. Unlike prior studies in epithelial tumor models, DAC did not induce a robust antitumor T cell response in sarcoma. Furthermore, DAC synergizes with gemcitabine independently of the immune system. Mechanistic analyses demonstrate that the combination therapy induces biphasic cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Therapeutic efficacy was sequence dependent, with gemcitabine priming cells for treatment with DAC through inhibition of ribonucleotide reductase. This study identifies an apparently unique application of DAC to augment the cytotoxic effects of conventional chemotherapy in an immune-independent manner. The concepts explored in this study represent a promising paradigm for cancer treatment by augmenting chemotherapy through addition of DAC to increase tolerability and improve patient response. These findings have widespread implications for the treatment of sarcomas and other aggressive malignancies.

Authors

Wade R. Gutierrez, Amanda Scherer, Jeffrey D. Rytlewski, Emily A. Laverty, Alexa P. Sheehan, Gavin R. McGivney, Qierra R. Brockman, Vickie Knepper-Adrian, Grace A. Roughton, Dawn E. Quelle, David J. Gordon, Varun Monga, Rebecca D. Dodd

×

Figure 2

Gem + DAC efficacy is immune independent.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Gem + DAC efficacy is immune independent.
(A and B) Tumor infiltration o...
(A and B) Tumor infiltration of total immune cells (CD45+) and total T cells (CD3+) in primary KP tumors were unchanged by Gem + DAC. Data represent individual tumors and the mean ± SD (n = 7–9 tumors/group). (C) Average frequencies of T cell populations in KP tumors, reported as percentages of total CD3+ T cells. Mean values are calculated from all individual tumors shown in A and B. (D) Generation of immune-competent and immune-deficient allograft models. KRIMS-1 cells derived from an untreated KP tumor were injected orthotopically into the gastrocnemius muscle of 129/SvJae or NSG mice. Mice were treated using the dosing scheme in Figure 1B. (E and F) Gem + DAC slowed tumor growth and prolonged survival in immune-competent 129/SvJae mice (n = 4–5/group). (G and H) Similarly, Gem + DAC efficacy was preserved in immune-deficient allografts in NSG mice (n = 8–9/group). Welch’s ANOVA and Dunnett’s T3 multiple comparison test used to analyze data in A, B, E, and G. Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) tests with Bonferroni correction were used to analyze the data in F and H. Adjusted α = 0.00833. *P < 0.05 in E and G. *P < 0.00833 in F and H.

Copyright © 2023 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts