Acute cardiac injury is prevalent in critical COVID-19 and associated with increased mortality. Its etiology remains debated, as initially presumed causes — myocarditis and cardiac necrosis — have proved uncommon. To elucidate the pathophysiology of COVID-19–associated cardiac injury, we conducted a prospective study of the first 69 consecutive COVID-19 decedents at CUIMC in New York City. Of 6 acute cardiac histopathologic features, presence of microthrombi was the most commonly detected among our cohort. We tested associations of cardiac microthrombi with biomarkers of inflammation, cardiac injury, and fibrinolysis and with in-hospital antiplatelet therapy, therapeutic anticoagulation, and corticosteroid treatment, while adjusting for multiple clinical factors, including COVID-19 therapies. Higher peak erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein were independently associated with increased odds of microthrombi, supporting an immunothrombotic etiology. Using single-nuclei RNA-sequencing analysis on 3 patients with and 4 patients without cardiac microthrombi, we discovered an enrichment of prothrombotic/antifibrinolytic, extracellular matrix remodeling, and immune-potentiating signaling among cardiac fibroblasts in microthrombi-positive, relative to microthrombi-negative, COVID-19 hearts. Non–COVID-19, nonfailing hearts were used as reference controls. Our study identifies a specific transcriptomic signature in cardiac fibroblasts as a salient feature of microthrombi-positive COVID-19 hearts. Our findings warrant further mechanistic study as cardiac fibroblasts may represent a potential therapeutic target for COVID-19–associated cardiac microthrombi.
Michael I. Brener, Michelle L. Hulke, Nobuaki Fukuma, Stephanie Golob, Robert S. Zilinyi, Zhipeng Zhou, Christos Tzimas, Ilaria Russo, Claire McGroder, Ryan D. Pfeiffer, Alexander Chong, Geping Zhang, Daniel Burkhoff, Martin B. Leon, Mathew S. Maurer, Jeffrey W. Moses, Anne-Catrin Uhlemann, Hanina Hibshoosh, Nir Uriel, Matthias J. Szabolcs, Björn Redfors, Charles C. Marboe, Matthew R. Baldwin, Nathan R. Tucker, Emily J. Tsai
Usage data is cumulative from April 2023 through April 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 1,506 | 374 |
130 | 95 | |
Figure | 68 | 1 |
Table | 12 | 0 |
Supplemental data | 120 | 54 |
Citation downloads | 24 | 0 |
Totals | 1,860 | 524 |
Total Views | 2,384 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.