Usage Information
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2021;6(18):e145823. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.145823.
Abstract
Cerebral malaria (CM) affects children and adults, but brain swelling is more severe in children. To investigate features associated with brain swelling in malaria, we performed blood profiling and brain MRI in a cohort of pediatric and adult patients with CM in Rourkela, India, and compared them with an African pediatric CM cohort in Malawi. We determined that higher plasma Plasmodium falciparum histidine rich protein 2 (PfHRP2) levels and elevated var transcripts that encode for binding to endothelial protein C receptor (EPCR) were linked to CM at both sites. Machine learning models trained on the African pediatric cohort could classify brain swelling in Indian children CM cases but had weaker performance for adult classification, due to overall lower parasite var transcript levels in this age group and more severe thrombocytopenia in Rourkela adults. Subgrouping of patients with CM revealed higher parasite biomass linked to severe thrombocytopenia and higher Group A–EPCR var transcripts in mild thrombocytopenia. Overall, these findings provide evidence that higher parasite biomass and a subset of Group A–EPCR binding variants are common features in children and adult CM cases, despite age differences in brain swelling.
Authors
Praveen K. Sahu, Fergal J. Duffy, Selasi Dankwa, Maria Vishnyakova, Megharay Majhi, Lukas Pirpamer, Vladimir Vigdorovich, Jabamani Bage, Sameer Maharana, Wilson Mandala, Stephen J. Rogerson, Karl B. Seydel, Terrie E. Taylor, Kami Kim, D. Noah Sather, Akshaya Mohanty, Rashmi R. Mohanty, Anita Mohanty, Rajyabardhan Pattnaik, John D. Aitchison, Angelika Hoffmann, Sanjib Mohanty, Joseph D. Smith, Maria Bernabeu, Samuel C. Wassmer
Usage data is cumulative from June 2022 through June 2023.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 3,029 | 289 |
| 155 | 83 | |
| Figure | 245 | 3 |
| Supplemental data | 44 | 4 |
| Citation downloads | 46 | 0 |
| Totals | 3,519 | 379 |
| Total Views | 3,898 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
