Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Physician-Scientist Development
    • Reviews
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Resource and Technical Advances
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Editorials
  • Perspectives
  • Physician-Scientist Development
  • Reviews
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Leptin receptor–expressing nucleus tractus solitarius neurons suppress food intake independently of GLP1 in mice
Wenwen Cheng, Ermelinda Ndoka, Chelsea Hutch, Karen Roelofs, Andrew MacKinnon, Basma Khoury, Jack Magrisso, Ki Suk Kim, Christopher J. Rhodes, David P. Olson, Randy J. Seeley, Darleen Sandoval, Martin G. Myers Jr.
Wenwen Cheng, Ermelinda Ndoka, Chelsea Hutch, Karen Roelofs, Andrew MacKinnon, Basma Khoury, Jack Magrisso, Ki Suk Kim, Christopher J. Rhodes, David P. Olson, Randy J. Seeley, Darleen Sandoval, Martin G. Myers Jr.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Endocrinology Metabolism

Leptin receptor–expressing nucleus tractus solitarius neurons suppress food intake independently of GLP1 in mice

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Leptin receptor–expressing (LepRb-expressing) neurons of the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS; LepRbNTS neurons) receive gut signals that synergize with leptin action to suppress food intake. NTS neurons that express preproglucagon (Ppg) (and that produce the food intake–suppressing PPG cleavage product glucagon-like peptide-1 [GLP1]) represent a subpopulation of mouse LepRbNTS cells. Using Leprcre, Ppgcre, and Ppgfl mouse lines, along with Designer Receptors Exclusively Activated by Designer Drugs (DREADDs), we examined roles for Ppg in GLP1NTS and LepRbNTS cells for the control of food intake and energy balance. We found that the cre-dependent ablation of NTS Ppgfl early in development or in adult mice failed to alter energy balance, suggesting the importance of pathways independent of NTS GLP1 for the long-term control of food intake. Consistently, while activating GLP1NTS cells decreased food intake, LepRbNTS cells elicited larger and more durable effects. Furthermore, while the ablation of NTS Ppgfl blunted the ability of GLP1NTS neurons to suppress food intake during activation, it did not impact the suppression of food intake by LepRbNTS cells. While Ppg/GLP1-mediated neurotransmission plays a central role in the modest appetite-suppressing effects of GLP1NTS cells, additional pathways engaged by LepRbNTS cells dominate for the suppression of food intake.

Authors

Wenwen Cheng, Ermelinda Ndoka, Chelsea Hutch, Karen Roelofs, Andrew MacKinnon, Basma Khoury, Jack Magrisso, Ki Suk Kim, Christopher J. Rhodes, David P. Olson, Randy J. Seeley, Darleen Sandoval, Martin G. Myers Jr.

×

Figure 3

Viral-mediated Ppg KO in the NTS.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Viral-mediated Ppg KO in the NTS.
(A) Schematic diagram showing deletion...
(A) Schematic diagram showing deletion of NTS Ppg by delivering mCherry-tagged AAVcre (AAVcre-mCherry) into the NTS of Ppgfl mice. (B and C) Representative images of GFP-IR in mice injected with AAVGFP (top panel, green) or mCherry-IR in AAVcre-mCherry (bottom panel, red) (B); GLP1-IR (purple) for similar mice is shown in C. All panels are representative of n ≥ 10 similar images. (D) Weekly body weight change on chow and HFD (measurements for each animal were normalized to its baseline weight). (E and F) Food intake is shown for the 8th week after surgery (E), and body composition is shown for 2 months after surgery (F). Data are from male animals; female body weight data are shown in Supplemental Figure 1I. Data are shown as mean ± SEM; D (n = 11–13), E (n = 6) and F (n = 5). All comparisons, P > 0.05 using repeated measures 2-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparisons test (D) and 2-tailed unpaired t test (E and F). AP, area postrema; cc, central canal. Scale bar: 150 μm.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts