Usage Information
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2019;4(17):e127817. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.127817.
Abstract
Many women with hyperandrogenemia suffer from irregular menses and infertility. However, it is unknown whether androgens directly affect reproduction. Since animal models of hyperandrogenemia-induced infertility are associated with obesity, which may impact reproductive function, we have created a lean mouse model of elevated androgen levels using implantation of low-dose 5α-dihydrotestosterone (DHT) pellets to separate the effects of elevated androgen levels from obesity. The hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis controls reproduction. While we have demonstrated that androgens impair ovarian function, androgens could also disrupt neuroendocrine function at the level of brain and/or pituitary to cause infertility. To understand how elevated androgen levels might act on pituitary gonadotropes to influence reproductive function, female mice with disruption of the androgen receptor (Ar) gene specifically in pituitary gonadotropes (PitARKO) were produced. DHT-treated control mice with intact pituitary Ar (Con-DHT) exhibited disrupted estrous cyclicity and fertility with reduced pituitary responsiveness to gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) at the level of both calcium signaling and luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion. These effects were ameliorated in DHT-treated PitARKO mice. Calcium signaling controls GnRH regulation of LH vesicle exotocysis. Our data implicate upregulation of GEM (a voltage-dependent calcium channel inhibitor) in the pituitary as a potential mechanism for the pathological effects of androgens. These results demonstrate that gonadotrope AR, as an extraovarian regulator, plays an important role in reproductive pathophysiology.
Authors
Zhiqiang Wang, Mingxiao Feng, Olubusayo Awe, Yaping Ma, Mingjie Shen, Ping Xue, Rexford Ahima, Andrew Wolfe, James Segars, Sheng Wu
Usage data is cumulative from December 2024 through December 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 513 | 85 |
| 86 | 19 | |
| Figure | 241 | 3 |
| Table | 32 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 42 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 94 | 0 |
| Totals | 1,008 | 107 |
| Total Views | 1,115 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
