Go to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • All ...
  • Videos
  • Collections
    • Resource and Technical Advances
    • Clinical Medicine
    • Reviews
    • Editorials
    • Perspectives
    • Top read articles
  • JCI This Month
    • Current issue
    • Past issues

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • In-Press Preview
  • Editorials
  • Viewpoint
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Transfers
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Intestinal epithelial potassium channels and CFTR chloride channels activated in ErbB tyrosine kinase inhibitor diarrhea
Tianying Duan, … , Jay R. Thiagarajah, Alan S. Verkman
Tianying Duan, … , Jay R. Thiagarajah, Alan S. Verkman
Published January 22, 2019
Citation Information: JCI Insight. 2019;4(4):e126444. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.126444.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Gastroenterology Therapeutics

Intestinal epithelial potassium channels and CFTR chloride channels activated in ErbB tyrosine kinase inhibitor diarrhea

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Diarrhea is a major side effect of ErbB receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in cancer chemotherapy. Here, we show that the primary mechanism of ErbB TKI diarrhea is activation of basolateral membrane potassium (K+) channels and apical membrane chloride (Cl–) channels in intestinal epithelia and demonstrate the efficacy of channel blockers in a rat model of TKI diarrhea. Short-circuit current in colonic epithelial cells showed that the TKIs gefitinib, lapatinib, and afatinib do not affect basal secretion but amplify carbachol-stimulated secretion by 2- to 3-fold. Mechanistic studies with the second-generation TKI afatinib showed that the amplifying effect on Cl– secretion was Ca2+ and cAMP independent, was blocked by CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) and K+ channel inhibitors, and involved EGFR binding and ERK signaling. Afatinib-amplified activation of basolateral K+ and apical Cl– channels was demonstrated by selective membrane permeabilization, ion substitution, and channel inhibitors. Rats that were administered afatinib orally at 60 mg/kg/day developed diarrhea with increased stool water from approximately 60% to greater than 80%, which was reduced by up to 75% by the K+ channel inhibitors clotrimazole or senicapoc or the CFTR inhibitor (R)-BPO-27. These results indicate a mechanism for TKI diarrhea involving K+ and Cl– channel activation and support the therapeutic efficacy of channel inhibitors.

Authors

Tianying Duan, Onur Cil, Jay R. Thiagarajah, Alan S. Verkman

×

Figure 9

Inhibitors of K+ channels and CFTR Cl– channels reduce afatinib-induced diarrhea in rats.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Inhibitors of K+ channels and CFTR Cl– channels reduce afatinib-induced ...
(A) Afatinib diarrhea model in Sprague-Dawley rats administered afatinib orally (60 mg/kg, daily). (Left) stool water content (percentage water) as measured daily. (Right) increase in stool water content in individual rats (stool water at indicated data minus stool water on day 0 in same rats). (B) Rats were administered afatinib starting on day 1 and treated starting on day 2 with BPO-27 (10 mg/kg, twice daily, intraperitoneally) or vehicle (mean ± SEM, n = 5 rats per group). (C) Similar protocol as in (B), except for treatment with clotrimazole (100 mg/kg, oral, in 2 divided doses) or vehicle (mean ± SEM, n = 6 rats per group). (D) Similar protocol as in (B), except for treatment with senicapoc (30 mg/kg, oral, twice daily) or vehicle (mean ± SEM, n = 5 rats per group). (E) Similar protocol except for treatment starting on day 1 with clotrimazole and BPO-27, same doses as in (B) and (C), or vehicle (mean ± SEM, n = 5 rats per group). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, comparing with day 0 in (A) and with versus without drug treatment in B–E.

Copyright © 2023 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN 2379-3708

Sign up for email alerts