Comparative study of cerebrospinal fluid α‐synuclein seeding aggregation assays for diagnosis of Parkinson's disease

UJ Kang, AK Boehme, G Fairfoul… - Movement …, 2019 - Wiley Online Library
UJ Kang, AK Boehme, G Fairfoul, M Shahnawaz, TC Ma, SJ Hutten, A Green, C Soto
Movement Disorders, 2019Wiley Online Library
Background PD diagnosis is based primarily on clinical criteria and can be inaccurate.
Biological markers, such as α‐synuclein aggregation, that reflect ongoing pathogenic
processes may increase diagnosis accuracy and allow disease progression monitoring.
Though α‐synuclein aggregation assays have been published, reproducibility,
standardization, and validation are key challenges for their development as clinical
biomarkers. Objective To cross‐validate two α‐synuclein seeding aggregation assays …
Background
PD diagnosis is based primarily on clinical criteria and can be inaccurate. Biological markers, such as α‐synuclein aggregation, that reflect ongoing pathogenic processes may increase diagnosis accuracy and allow disease progression monitoring. Though α‐synuclein aggregation assays have been published, reproducibility, standardization, and validation are key challenges for their development as clinical biomarkers.
Objective
To cross‐validate two α‐synuclein seeding aggregation assays developed to detect pathogenic oligomeric α‐synuclein species in CSF using samples from the same PD patients and healthy controls from the BioFIND cohort.
Methods
CSF samples were tested by two independent laboratories in a blinded fashion. BioFIND features standardized biospecimen collection of clinically typical moderate PD patients and nondisease controls. α‐synuclein aggregation was measured by protein misfolding cyclic amplification (Soto lab) and real‐time quaking‐induced conversion (Green lab). Results were analyzed by an independent statistician.
Results
Measuring 105 PD and 79 healthy control CSF samples, these assays showed 92% concordance. The areas under the curve from receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for the diagnosis of PD versus healthy controls were 0.93 for protein misfolding cyclic amplification, 0.89 for real‐time quaking‐induced conversion, and 0.95 when considering only concordant assay results. Clinical characteristics of false‐positive and ‐negative subjects were not different from true‐negative and ‐positive subjects, respectively.
Conclusions
These α‐synuclein seeding aggregation assays are reliable and reproducible for PD diagnosis. Assay parameters did not correlate with clinical parameters, including disease severity or duration. This assay is highly accurate for PD diagnosis and may impact clinical practice and clinical trials. © 2019 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Wiley Online Library