METHODS

Patients, including those with stable, asymptomatic CNS disease, were randomly assigned 1: 1 to neratinib (240 mg once every day) plus capecitabine (750 mg/m 2 twice a day 14 d/21 d) with loperamide prophylaxis, or to lapatinib (1,250 mg once every day) plus capecitabine (1,000 mg/m 2 twice a day 14 d/21 d). Coprimary end points were centrally confirmed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). NALA was considered positive if either primary end point was met (α split between end points). Secondary end points were time to CNS disease intervention, investigator-assessed PFS, objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), clinical benefit rate, safety, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

RESULTS

A total of 621 patients from 28 countries were randomly assigned (N+ C, n= 307; L+ C, n= 314). Centrally reviewed PFS was improved with N+ C (hazard ratio [HR], 0.76; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.93; stratified log-rank P=. 0059). The OS HR was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.72 to 1.07; P=. 2098). Fewer interventions for CNS disease occurred with N+ C versus L+ C (cumulative incidence, 22.8% v 29.2%; P=. 043). ORRs were N+ C 32.8%(95% CI, 27.1 to 38.9) and L+ C 26.7%(95% CI, 21.5 to 32.4; P=. 1201); median DoR was 8.5 versus 5.6 months, respectively (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.74; P=. 0004). The most common all-grade adverse events were diarrhea (N+ C 83% v L+ C 66%) and nausea (53% v 42%). Discontinuation rates and HRQoL were similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

N+ C significantly improved PFS and time to intervention for CNS disease versus L+ C. No new N+ C safety signals were observed.