Audiogenic priming in DBA/2J and C57 BL/6J mice: Interactions among age, prime‐to‐test interval, and index of seizure

RA Schreiber, JM Graham Jr - … Psychobiology: The Journal of …, 1976 - Wiley Online Library
RA Schreiber, JM Graham Jr
Developmental Psychobiology: The Journal of the International …, 1976Wiley Online Library
Abstract C57BL/6J mice, not susceptible to audiogenic seizures (AGS) on the 1st exposure
to an acoustic stimulus, were exposed to the acoustic stimulus for 1 min and then tested at
some later date (acoustic priming). They were first exposed at either 8, 16, 19, 22, or 28 days
of age, and then tested for AGS 2‐16 days after priming. DBA/2J mice, susceptible to AGS
on the 1st exposure to intense noise, were exposed to the acoustic stimulus at 26 days of
age, and then again 2‐14 days later. Data indicate that the incidence of AGS upon the 2nd …
Abstract
C57BL/6J mice, not susceptible to audiogenic seizures (AGS) on the 1st exposure to an acoustic stimulus, were exposed to the acoustic stimulus for 1 min and then tested at some later date (acoustic priming). They were first exposed at either 8, 16, 19, 22, or 28 days of age, and then tested for AGS 2‐16 days after priming. DBA/2J mice, susceptible to AGS on the 1st exposure to intense noise, were exposed to the acoustic stimulus at 26 days of age, and then again 2‐14 days later. Data indicate that the incidence of AGS upon the 2nd exposure to the acoustic stimulus is a function of age at priming, the prime‐to‐test interval in days, and the index of seizures. In the case of DBA mice, later effects are also dependent on the initial level of seizure.
Wiley Online Library