A multisite assessment of the quantitative capabilities of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay

R Blakemore, P Nabeta, AL Davidow… - American journal of …, 2011 - atsjournals.org
R Blakemore, P Nabeta, AL Davidow, V Vadwai, R Tahirli, V Munsamy, M Nicol, M Jones…
American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2011atsjournals.org
Rationale: The Xpert MTB/RIF is an automated molecular test for Mycobacterium
tuberculosis that estimates bacterial burden by measuring the threshold-cycle (Ct) of its M.
tuberculosis–specific real-time polymerase chain reaction. Bacterial burden is an important
biomarker for disease severity, infection control risk, and response to therapy. Objectives:
Evaluate bacterial load quantitation by Xpert MTB/RIF compared with conventional
quantitative methods. Methods: Xpert MTB/RIF results were compared with smear …
Rationale: The Xpert MTB/RIF is an automated molecular test for Mycobacterium tuberculosis that estimates bacterial burden by measuring the threshold-cycle (Ct) of its M. tuberculosis–specific real-time polymerase chain reaction. Bacterial burden is an important biomarker for disease severity, infection control risk, and response to therapy.
Objectives: Evaluate bacterial load quantitation by Xpert MTB/RIF compared with conventional quantitative methods.
Methods: Xpert MTB/RIF results were compared with smear-microscopy, semiquantiative solid culture, and time-to-detection in liquid culture for 741 patients and 2,008 samples tested in a multisite clinical trial. An internal control real-time polymerase chain reaction was evaluated for its ability to identify inaccurate quantitative Xpert MTB/RIF results.
Measurements and Main Results: Assays with an internal control Ct greater than 34 were likely to be inaccurately quantitated; this represented 15% of M. tuberculosis–positive tests. Excluding these, decreasing M. tuberculosis Ct was associated with increasing smear microscopy grade for smears of concentrated sputum pellets (rs = −0.77) and directly from sputum (rs = −0.71). A Ct cutoff of approximately 27.7 best predicted smear-positive status. The association between M. tuberculosis Ct and time-to-detection in liquid culture (rs = 0.68) and semiquantitative colony counts (rs = −0.56) was weaker than smear. Tests of paired same-patient sputum showed that high-viscosity sputum samples contained ×32 more M. tuberculosis than nonviscous samples. Comparisons between the grade of the acid-fast bacilli smear and Xpert MTB/RIF quantitative data across study sites enabled us to identify a site outlier in microscopy.
Conclusions: Xpert MTB/RIF quantitation offers a new, standardized approach to measuring bacterial burden in the sputum of patients with tuberculosis.
ATS Journals