TBC1D32 variants disrupt retinal ciliogenesis and cause retinitis pigmentosa

Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) is the most common inherited retinal disease (IRD) and is characterized by photoreceptor degeneration and progressive vision loss. We report 4 patients presenting with RP from 3 unrelated families with variants in TBC1D32, which to date has never been associated with an IRD. To validate TBC1D32 as a putative RP causative gene, we combined Xenopus in vivo approaches and human induced pluripotent stem cell–derived (iPSC-derived) retinal models. Our data showed that TBC1D32 was expressed during retinal development and that it played an important role in retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) differentiation. Furthermore, we identified a role for TBC1D32 in ciliogenesis of the RPE. We demonstrated elongated ciliary defects that resulted in disrupted apical tight junctions, loss of functionality (delayed retinoid cycling and altered secretion balance), and the onset of an epithelial-mesenchymal transition–like phenotype. Last, our results suggested photoreceptor differentiation defects, including connecting cilium anomalies, that resulted in impaired trafficking to the outer segment in cones and rods in TBC1D32 iPSC-derived retinal organoids. Overall, our data highlight a critical role for TBC1D32 in the retina and demonstrate that TBC1D32 mutations lead to RP. We thus identify TBC1D32 as an IRD-causative gene.


Introduction
Inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) are a group of clinically and genetically heterogeneous disorders characterized by a dysfunction or degeneration of the light-sensing cells of the retina, the photoreceptors, and/or their underlying support tissue, the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) (1).In the majority of cases, IRDs are associated with a progressive loss of vision that can have a variable age of onset and severity of symptoms.Although each disease is monogenic, there are more than 270 known causative genes (RetNet, https://sph.uth.edu/retnet).The most common IRD is a rod-cone dystrophy known as retinitis pigmentosa (RP) (2), characterized by night blindness appearing in childhood and followed

R E S E A R C H A R T I C L E
JCI Insight 2023;8 (21):e169426 https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.169426by a progressive loss of peripheral vision.There are more than 90 causative RP genes with a collective prevalence of 1 in 4,000 (3) and with autosomal-dominant, autosomal-recessive, or X-linked modes of transmission (4).Furthermore, mutations in the same gene can give rise to either isolated RP or RP associated with extra-retinal symptoms.
The clinical heterogeneity associated with RP is partly explained by the diverse localizations and roles of the proteins encoded by the causative genes within the retina (5).The photoreceptors have a unique morphology comprising an axon, nucleus-containing cell body, mitochondria-rich inner segment (IS), and outer segment (OS) filled with lipid disks where the phototransduction process is initiated following light interaction.The IS is connected to the OS by a highly modified primary cilium called the connecting cilium (CC).The genes responsible for isolated RP can be divided into groups that play key roles in the cell body (splicing, transcription, development), IS (transport, signaling) or OS (structure, phototransduction) (3,5).The genes for syndromic RP are mostly localized at the level of the CC or the periciliary membrane complex (6).These diseases are also known as ciliopathies, and although they can give rise to isolated RP, retinal defects are often linked to defects in other ciliated tissues (7).Interestingly, the RPE contains a primary cilium on its apical side, which is critical for RPE maturation and homeostasis maintenance (8), and RPE ciliary defects were recently associated with retinal ciliopathies (9).
Currently, the genetic causes in approximately 40% of patients with RP remain unknown (4).To resolve such cases, we performed whole-exome sequencing (WES) in the probands from 3 unrelated families presenting clinically with autosomal-recessive RP and identified biallelic variants in TBC1D32 (OMIM: 615867).TBC1D32 belongs to a family of Rab GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) containing a Tre-2, Bub-2, and Cdc16 (TBC) domain.TBC1D32 has been shown to have a role in regulating the structure of the primary cilium in the neural tube (10).Zebrafish tbc1d32 morphants showed a curvature of the body axis and hydrocephalus, and a TBC1D32-knockout mouse model exhibited neural patterning defects comprising exencephaly, preaxial polydactyly, and poorly developed eyes.Accordingly, recessive loss-offunction TBC1D32 variants were reported as responsible for oral-facial-digital (OFD) syndrome type IX (OMIM: 258865), a ciliopathy characterized by defects in development of the oral cavity, face, and digits, associated with microphthalmia/anophthalmia (11).However, OFD syndrome is not classically associated with retinal anomalies, and the TBC1D32 animal models do not have reported retinal defects.
Therefore, to validate TBC1D32 as a putative RP causative gene, we combined animal and human disease modeling by (i) performing hypomorphic knockdowns in an in vivo Xenopus model and (ii) generating induced pluripotent stem cell-derived (iPSC-derived) RPE and retinal organoids from a patient with RP carrying TBC1D32 variants.Together, our data show that TBC1D32 is expressed during retinal development and plays an important role in ciliogenesis.The disruption of TBC1D32 results in abnormal RPE maturation and function and defective photoreceptor differentiation and OS trafficking.Overall, we identify TBC1D32 as an IRD-causative gene, which has implications for alleviating current diagnostic deadlocks.

Results
Three unrelated families present with clinical features of RP.Four patients from 3 unrelated families (patient 1, family 1; patient 2, family 2; patients 3 and 4, family 3) were studied (Supplemental Figure 1; supplemental material available online with this article; https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.169426DS1),and their ocular data are summarized in Supplemental Table 1.Night blindness occurred in childhood (patients 1 and 2) or in early adulthood (patients 3 and 4).Refraction errors were highly variable; the 2 patients older than 50 years were legally blind.Peripheral visual field impairment occurred early in the second decade, with a severe impairment after the age of 50 years.Beyond the classic signs of RP noted on multimodal imaging and on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), all patients shared abnormal visibility of large choroidal vessels in the entire peripheral retina, suggesting RPE loss with photoreceptor degeneration (Figure 1).None of the patients had documented macular edema.On full-field electroretinogram recordings, none of the patients had discernable rod and cone responses (data not shown).The patients did not mention any systemic symptoms, and consistently a systemic checkup only revealed mild MRI anomalies with an atrophic aspect of the superior vermis in patients 1 and 2 (Supplemental Figure 2).In addition, patient 2 was diagnosed at 27 years of age with nonproteinuric chronic kidney disease.Urinary protein-to-creatinine and albumin-to-creatinine ratios were 0.19 and 0.10 mg/mg, respectively, with no notable urinary sediment.Autoimmunity markers were negative, and C3 and C4 complement fractions, and IgG, IgA, and IgM plasmatic levels, were normal.Kidneys were bilaterally reduced (95 mm) and showed mild cortical hyperechogenicity JCI Insight 2023;8(21):e169426 https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.169426with a few bilateral cortical and parapelvic cysts (maximum 9 mm).Polycystic kidney disease (PKD) was ruled out by negative genetic testing of the causative genes PKD1 and PKD2.
TBC1D32 pathogenic variants segregate with RP in 3 families.Trio WES was performed on patient 1 and his healthy parents (Supplemental Figure 1A).No mutation in genes previously associated with syndromic and nonsyndromic RP (https://sph.uth.edu/retnet/) was detected.We identified 2 variants in the TBC1D32 gene (NM_001367760.1) in trans in patient 1, 1 of which was carried by each parent.The maternal intron 2 variant c.317+5G>A was predicted to probably alter splicing according to Human Splicing Finder and described at a frequency of 0.000004092 in the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/).To ascertain pathogenicity, we performed reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) amplification of exons 1 to 5 on whole blood cells (WBCs) and detected 2 bands in the proband and maternal samples, the smaller of which corresponded to in-frame skipping of exon 2 (Supplemental Figure 1D).The paternal variant, c.846delTCCTA; p.(Asn282Lysfs*7) (exon 7), was absent from the gnomAD and was predicted to induce a frameshift and the introduction of a premature termination codon (PTC).WES performed for patient 2 (Supplemental Figure 1B) showed that he was compound heterozygous for the variants c.18_27del; p.(Ser6Argfs*8) in exon 1 (maternal allele) and c.1141-1G>A in intron 10 (paternal allele).Both variants were absent from databases.The second variant was predicted to strongly alter splicing according to an in silico prediction software (https://mobidetails.iurc.montp.inserm.fr/MD).To confirm its pathogenicity, we performed RT-PCR amplification of exons 9 to 13 on WBCs of the patient and his father and detected as many as 7 additional splicing events that bore PTCs and were not present in the control (Supplemental Figure 1E).
Trio WES was performed on patients 3 and 4 and a healthy sister (Supplemental Figure 1C).The affected siblings were compound heterozygous for the variants c.1267G>T; p.(Glu423*) in exon 12, and c.3513G>T; p.(Trp1171Cys) in exon 31, whereas the unaffected sister was heterozygous for the c.3513G>T variant.The frequency in gnomAD of the c.1267G>T and c.3513G>T variants were 0.0000124 (described 3 times in the database) and 0.00000402 (described once), respectively.The missense variant is situated in the carboxy-terminal Rab GAP TBC domain, in a highly conserved position relative to the orthologous proteins (Supplemental Figure 1F).The in silico pathogenicity scores were ambiguous (https://varsome.com/).Structural analysis using AlphaFold showed that the tryptophan at position 1171 was located at the beginning of an alpha helix, and its substitution by a cysteine residue was likely to create a steric hindrance with a tyrosine at position 1019.However, with a Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion pathogenicity score of 31 (https://cadd.gs.washington.edu/),this variant was classed as of unknown significance according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics classification.Taken together, the patients of all 3 families carried biallelic TBC1D32 variants, of which only 1 allele could be predicted as loss of function.
tbc1d32 is expressed in the neuroretina and RPE during Xenopus development.As TBC1D32 variants were never previously linked to RP, we used a Xenopus laevis model, which is highly suited to functional development and gene knockdown studies (12), to test the expression and role of tbc1d32 in the retina.Xenopus tbc1d32 is located on chromosome 5L, displays an exon/intron structure identical to the human homolog (33 exons), and is predicted to encode a 1,297 aa protein with approximately 60% identity to human TBC1D32 (accession NM_001367759.1,NM_001367760.1,or NM_152730.6).We cloned the Xenopus tbc1d32 full-length coding sequence (Supplemental Figure 3) and analyzed its expression during development (Figure 2A).tbc1d32 transcripts were first detected at stage 25 (13) in multiciliated epithelial cells in the epidermis and in the optic vesicle.From stage 27-28, expression was also detected in the otic vesicle, brain, and pronephric nephrostomes.We further analyzed the expression of tbc1d32, and indian hedgehog (ihh) as an RPE marker (14), on retinal sections using an RNAscope fluorescent multiplex assay (Figure 2B).At stage 25, tbc1d32 was expressed in all progenitor cells of the optic vesicle.At stage 27-28, transcripts were abundantly detected in the presumptive neural retina, but only a few molecules were detected in the presumptive RPE, labeled with ihh.At stages 32-33, tbc1d32 transcripts were clearly visible in the developing RPE, with a peak at stage 35-36.From stage 37-38 onwards, tbc1d32 expression decreased in the RPE, inner nuclear, and ganglion cell layers but remained well expressed in the outer nuclear layer (ONL) containing the photoreceptors, where it decreased at later stages.Finally, we verified the presence of tbc1d32 transcripts in RPE cells by quantitative PCR (qPCR) on mRNAs from dissected RPE at stage 35-36 (Figure 2C).In conclusion, in the retina, tbc1d32 is expressed in retinal progenitors, developing photoreceptors, and RPE cells, consistent with a putative role in retinogenesis.
Knockdown of Xenopus tbc1d32 leads to developmental RPE and photoreceptor defects.To determine the impact of tbc1d32 knockdown in retinal development, we designed 2 morpholinos (Mo1 and Mo2) that we injected at the 4-cell stage in 1 blastomere giving rise to neural ectoderm (Figure 3, A and B, and Supplemental Figures 3 and 4).This led to a unilateral tbc1d32 knockdown mainly limited to neural tissues (Supplemental Figure 4).A high dose (20 ng) of either Mo1 or Mo2 led to severe developmental defects, including curvature of the body axis and microphthalmia/anophthalmia of the injected embryos (data not shown).No discernable eye malformations were observed upon injection of a control Mo.
As we suspected hypomorphic pathogenicity in TBC1D32 patients, we tested lower doses of tbc1d32 Mo.At a dose of 10 or 15 ng of Mo1, Xenopus embryos no longer displayed a microphthalmic phenotype, and we did not detect retinal toxicity using a cell death assay (Supplemental Figure 5).By contrast, morphant embryos exhibited retinal pigmentation defects, comprising decreased intensity and discontinuity in pigmentation on retinal sections compared with controls (Figure 3C).This phenotype was similar upon Mo2 injection (Supplemental Figure 6A) and was partially restored upon coinjection with Mo-resistant

R E S E A R C H A R T I C L E
JCI Insight 2023;8(21):e169426 https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.169426tbc1d32 mRNAs (i.e., not recognized by the Mo), demonstrating its specificity (Figure 3C).We further analyzed actin cytoskeleton organization in RPE cells by phalloidin staining of dissected eyes injected with Mo1 or Mo2 (Figure 3D and Supplemental Figure 6B).In controls, phalloidin staining was uniform,  outlining cell membranes and highlighting the typical hexagonal shape of RPE cells, whereas the staining was heterogeneous and irregular in tbc1d32 morphants, highlighting an altered shape of RPE cells.We hence investigated the impact of tbc1d32 knockdown on RPE differentiation using microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (mitf) and ihh as RPE markers (14).Using in situ hybridization, we found that their expression was significantly decreased in the retinas of embryos injected with Mo1 or Mo2 compared with controls (Figure 4, A-C, and Supplemental Figure 7, A and B).This decrease was verified by qPCR (Supplemental Figure 8).Importantly, this effect was partially rescued upon coinjection with Mo-resistant tbc1d32 mRNAs (Supplemental Figure 9).Collectively, these data suggest a key role for tbc1d32 in RPE differentiation.
We also explored whether photoreceptor development was affected upon tbc1d32 knockdown.By immunofluorescence (IF) at stage 41, when photoreceptors are well differentiated, we found that the vast majority of morphant retinas injected with 10 ng of Mo1 exhibited normal labeling in the ONL of both rhodopsin and SM cone opsin (Figure 4D).By contrast, at a higher dose of 15 ng, around half of the morphant embryos showed reduced staining.To determine whether these defects arise early during photoreceptor differentiation, we assessed rhodopsin expression at stage 35-36, when rhodopsin RNA begins to be detected.We found significantly reduced staining in tbc1d32 morphant retinas compared with controls (Figure 4E), which was verified following Mo2 injections (Supplemental Figure 7C).Taken together, tbc1d32 knockdown results in RPE defects, while photoreceptors are affected in a dose-dependent manner, being either largely preserved or exhibiting obvious differentiation defects.
Xenopus RPE ciliogenesis is affected upon tbc1d32 knockdown.Defects in primary cilia morphology, namely curled cilia, were reported in both neural progenitor cells of Tbc1d32 -/-mouse embryos and in renal tubules of zebrafish tbc1d32 morphants (10).Consistently, by staining with the widely used cilium markers Arl13b (ciliary shaft marker) and γ-Tubulin (γ-Tub; basal body marker), we detected ciliogenesis defects in the neural tube of Xenopus tbc1d32 morphants, which displayed longer primary cilia than controls (Figure 5, A and B).We thus assayed if the RPE developmental defects in the tbc1d32 morphants were also associated with ciliogenesis defects.As primary cilia are necessary for maturation of mouse RPE but disappear in fully differentiated cells (15), we first characterized the developmental window during Xenopus retinogenesis when RPE cilia were present.We used the RPE marker Otx2, to delineate cells, and acetylated α-Tubulin and γ-Tub, to label primary cilia.First, we verified that acetylated α-Tubulin colocalized with Arl13b along the cilium and with γ-Tub at the basal body level, verifying that it is a reliable marker of the Xenopus RPE cilium (Figure 5C).We detected ciliated RPE cells in the presumptive retina from stage 27-28.The percentage of ciliated cells increased and peaked at stage 35, then decreased from stage 37-38 onward (Figure 5, D and E).In tbc1d32 morphant retinas of stage 35 embryos, the mean cilia length was significantly higher than in control retinas (Figure 5, F and G, and Supplemental Figure 10, A and B).We then analyzed photoreceptor ciliogenesis and found a significant decrease in the number of photoreceptors showing Arl13b staining in tbc1d32 morphant retinas compared with controls (Figure 5, H and I, and Supplemental Figure 10, C and D).In conclusion, tbc1d32 knockdown impacted ciliogenesis in both Xenopus RPE and photoreceptor cells, albeit in different ways.
Human TBC1D32 fibroblasts display a primary cilium defect.Human fibroblasts have long constituted a classical screening assay for ciliary defects (16).Therefore, we cultured fibroblasts from a skin biopsy of patient 1 to better study the expression of both mutant TBC1D32 alleles and their impact on ciliogenesis.Using primers specific to exons 1 and 8 to assay the c.317+5G>A allele, we detected a 931 bp band in control cells and 3 bands in the patient cells (Supplemental Figure 11A): the first was similar in size to the control band but contained the last 18 bp of intron 2 (Supplemental Figure 11B) that introduced a PTC; the second and most predominant was 769 bp and corresponded to the in-frame skipping of exon 2 (Supplemental Figure 11C), as observed in patient WBCs; the third was 591 bp and corresponded to the skipping of exons 2 and 3 that introduced a PTC (Supplemental Figure 11D).Thus, only transcript 2 was predicted to lead to translation, which corroborated our observations in WBCs, despite the less comprehensive analysis in this cell type.Using primers specific to exons 6 and 11 to assay the c.846delTCCTA allele, we detected an approximately 600 bp amplicon in control and patient cells (Supplemental Figure 11E), the latter of which contained a transcript with the 5 bp deletion in exon 7 (Supplemental Figure 11F) that introduced a PTC.These results suggested the mutant transcript did not undergo nonsense-mediated decay, which was consistent with the qPCR results showing similar levels of TBC1D32 expression in control and patient fibroblasts (Supplemental Figure 11G).We assayed ciliogenesis by IF studies of ARL13B with the axoneme markers acetylated α-tubulin and polyglutamylated tubulin (GT335) and the basal body marker pericentrin (PCN), which is present in both the mother and daughter centrosomes (17).We detected a similar spatial distribution between control and TBC1D32 fibroblasts (Figure 6, A-F).By contrast, and consistent with the Xenopus data, we detected a significantly elongated ARL13B-labeled cilium in the patient cells compared with controls (Figure 6, A-G).We also assayed intraflagellar transport (IFT) by IF studies of IFT88 (18,19), which correctly extended beyond acetylated α-tubulin at both ends of the cilium in control and patient cells (Figure 6, H and I).Last, consistent with the qPCR data, we clearly detected TBC1D32 using an antibody specific to an epitope encoded by exons 24 to 28.TBC1D32 was located basal to acetylated α-tubulin in control and patient fibroblasts (Figure 6, J and K), where it overlapped with PCN (Figure 6, L-O).Taken together, TBC1D32 localized to the centrosomes of the primary cilium in human fibroblasts, and mutant TBC1D32 proteins led to elongation defects.

R E S E A R C H A R T I C L E
TBC1D32 iPSC-derived RPE has an elongated cilium and disrupted tight junctions.To unravel the pathophysiology associated with TBC1D32 mutations, we reprogrammed the fibroblasts of patient 1 into iPSCs to subsequently generate highly relevant human retinal models.Two TBC1D32 iPSC lines were confirmed as pluripotent by the expression of the host pluripotency markers (Supplemental Figure 12, A and B) and germline markers following an embryoid body (EB) differentiation assay (Supplemental Figure 12C).In addition, we confirmed genomic stability by testing the copy number of the recombination hotspots in iPSCs (20) (Supplemental Figure 12D).Interestingly, contrasting the fibroblast data, TBC1D32 expression levels in the 2 patient iPSC lines were lower than in control cells (Supplemental Figure 12E).Last, we verified the presence of the causative TBC1D32 mutations c.317+5G>A in exon 2 and c.846delTCCTA in exon 7 in the patient iPSC lines by Sanger sequencing (Supplemental Figure 12F).
We then differentiated the patient and control lines into iPSC-derived RPE.Due to the different qPCR profiles observed between fibroblasts and iPSCs, we assayed TBC1D32 expression in the iPSC-derived RPE and detected lower levels in the patient RPE compared with controls (Supplemental Figure 13A), further suggesting tissue-specific regulation.By IF analysis, TBC1D32 partially colocalized with PCN in control and patient iPSC-derived RPE, as in primary fibroblasts, but the staining intensity was lower in the patient RPE (Supplemental Figure 13, B and C), consistent with the qPCR results.We then assayed the morphology of the TBC1D32 iPSC-derived RPE from 12 weeks postseeding.Colabeling of the apical tight junction marker ZO1 and ARL13B demonstrated a regular cobblestone morphology and primary cilium staining for the control RPE (Figure 7A).By contrast, the morphology of the TBC1D32 patient iPSC-derived RPE was highly irregular, with cilia significantly longer than controls (Figure 7, B and C).Furthermore, we detected gaps between cells, and ZO1 aggregates at the contact points of multiple cells, in the TBC1D32 RPE that were absent from control RPE (Figure 7, D and E).The disrupted tight junctions were verified by trans-epithelial resistance (TER) measurements, which steadily decreased in the TBC1D32 RPE from 6 weeks postseeding to levels significantly lower than control RPE at 13 weeks (Figure 7F).In conclusion, the TBC1D32 patient iPSC-derived RPE presented with a primary cilium defect and disrupted apical tight junctions.
TBC1D32 iPSC-derived RPE displays an epithelial-mesenchymal transition-like phenotype.Primary cilium defects in RPE reportedly provoke an epithelial-mesenchymal transition-like (EMT-like) phenotype, characterized initially by a loss of tight junctions (21).We thus assayed the TBC1D32 RPE for signs of cytoskeletal changes associated with EMT by testing the expression of vimentin and smooth muscle actin (SMA) (22) (Figure 8, A-D).A low and relatively regular intensity of vimentin expression was detected in the control iPSC-derived RPE, whereas islands of upregulated expression were detected in the patient RPE, which were associated with a loss of MERTK expression, further validating the loss of RPE identity.Similarly, large and abundant SMA-positive islands were detected in the TBC1D32 iPSC-derived RPE, compared with controls, which were associated with disrupted ZO1 expression (Supplemental Figure 13, D-F).Thus, the disrupted apical junctions in the TBC1D32 iPSC-derived RPE were accompanied by a transition to a mesenchymal state.
These observations were further validated by gene expression levels of other EMT markers (Figure 8, E-I).The genes encoding the adherens junction markers E-cadherin (CDH1), P-cadherin (CDH3), and β-catenin (CTNNB1) showed reduced expression levels in the TBC1D32 RPE, compared with controls, validating the loss of epithelial cell-cell contacts.Furthermore, the transcription factor SNAIL (SNAI1), which mediates EMT, and fibronectin 1 (FN1), a marker of EMT, showed increased expression levels.Consistently, Western blot analysis of E-and P-cadherin showed significantly decreased levels in the patient RPE compared with controls (Figure 8, J and K).In contrast to the qPCR data, β-catenin showed similar levels in control and patient RPE (Figure 8L).We thus analyzed its subcellular distribution and showed that it was predominately localized to the membrane fraction in control RPE and to the cytosolic fraction in the patient RPE (Figure 8M).This difference was consistent with the release of β-catenin from the membrane, which allows it to act as a transcriptional activator of EMT genes, such as SNAI1 (23).Taken together, the TBC1D32 iPSC-derived RPE displays altered morphology and deregulated expression profiles that are hallmarks of EMT activation.
TBC1D32 iPSC-derived RPE shows altered functionality.The loss of tight and adherens junctions reportedly affects the apical-basal polarity of RPE with an impact on functionality (21).Hence, we assayed the expression of CRALBP, an RPE marker and actor of the visual cycle, together with N-cadherin, an adherens junction and EMT marker (22) (Figure 9, A and B).We detected a regular membrane staining of N-cadherin in control RPE compared with notable patches of discontinuous N-cadherin staining in the patient RPE.Similarly, we detected reduced CRALBP staining at the membrane and an increased signal in the cytosol in the patient RPE compared with controls.This shift was verified by Western blot analyses (Figure 9C).Furthermore, the most pronounced areas of CRALBP staining showed reduced N-cadherin levels.Moreover, we detected a decrease in expression of the corresponding gene, RLBP1, as well as other visual cycle genes, LRAT and RPE65 in TBC1D32 RPE compared with controls (Supplemental Figure 13, G-I).ABCA4, which is involved in the visual cycle in photoreceptors, was recently described to be also expressed in the RPE (24), and accordingly, its expression was also reduced in the patient RPE (Supplemental Figure 13J).
To determine whether the differential expression of these visual cycle actors in the patient RPE impacted its function, we assayed for the accumulation of retinoids, detectable as lipid droplets termed retinosomes ( 25) by transmission electron microscopy (TEM).We detected an accumulation of lipid droplets in the TBCD132 RPE as compared with controls (Figure 9, D-F), which were identified as retinosomes by the specific marker perilipin-2 (Figure 9G).The significant abundance of retinosomes prompted us to assay the polarized secretion of the angiogenic factors pigment epithelium-derived factor (PEDF) and VEGF, another key RPE function, by ELISA (26).We detected a significant increase in apical, and a significant decrease in basal, PEDF and VEGF secretion in the TBC1D32 RPE, as compared with controls (Figure 9H).Taken together, the cellular changes in the TBC1D32 RPE result in disrupted retinoid cycling and altered secretion balance.
TBC1D32 iPSC-derived retinal organoids show defective trafficking to outer segments.As photoreceptors possess a specialized cilium, the CC, we assayed whether TBC1D32 defects also led to photoreceptor anomalies in iPSC-derived retinal organoids (27).Brightfield imaging showed that control and TBC1D32 organoids had a similar morphology with a brush border (Figure 10, A and B) containing IS and OS-like structures and a distinct lamina corresponding to the ONL (Figure 10, C and D).This organization was confirmed by IF studies of CRX and recoverin (RCVRN), although staining was visibly reduced in the patient organoids (Figure 10,  E and F).Furthermore, we assayed the expression of ZO1 and CRALBP, markers of the outer limiting membrane (OLM) formed by the end feet of Müller glial cells.The OLM was clearly discernible by the colocalized CRALBP/ZO1 signals in the control organoids, whereas we detected only a faint CRALBP signal and no ZO1 signal in the TBC1D32 organoids (Figure 10, G and H).Moreover, costaining of ZO1 and rhodopsin kinase (RK) showed that RK expression extended beyond the OLM into the IS/OS layer in control organoids but not as far in the TBC1D32 organoids (Figure 10, I and J).We thus investigated the CC by assaying the expression of ARL13B in parallel to rhodopsin (RHO).In control organoids, ARL13B was visible as punctate dots close to the ONL with RHO extending beyond into the OS, whereas in TBC1D32 organoids, ARL13B was only faintly discernible and RHO remained close to the ONL (Figure 10, K and L).The RK and RHO expression profiles suggested that trafficking to the OS was impaired; thus, we tested the expression of the cone and rod OS marker ABCA4 and the rod-specific OS marker PDE6B.ABCA4 and PDE6B staining was clearly detectable in the OS of the control organoids but visibly reduced in the TBC1D32 organoids (Figure 10, M and N).In addition, arrestin 3-positive (ARR3-positive) cones of varying lengths were identified in the control organoids, a subset of which coexpressed the more mature red/green (R/G) opsin cone marker (Figure 10O).By comparison, the cones in the TBC1D32 organoids appeared stunted with a distinctly visible colocalization signal at the edge of the cells beyond the ONL (Figure 10P).In conclusion, in addition to affecting the RPE, TBC1D32 variants directly affect photoreceptors at the level of the CC and result in impaired trafficking to the OS in both cones and rods.

Discussion
With the technological advancements of next-generation sequencing, the genetic diagnosis yield of IRDs has considerably increased over the last 10 years (28).However, recently, the slope of the identification curve has reached a plateau (RetNet, https://sph.uth.edu/retnet),raising challenges for genetic counseling Representative Western blot analysis of E-cadherin (J), P-cadherin (K), and β-catenin (L) expression and quantification relative to the β-actin loading control; the same membrane was hybridized with 2 different primary antibodies in panels J and L. Data represented as mean ± SEM; n = 3 blots; *P < 0.05; 2-tailed Mann-Whitney test.(M) Representative Western blot analysis and quantification of 2 independent blots of β-catenin distribution in the cytosol versus membrane fractions of control and TBC1D32 iPSC-derived RPE relative to the β-actin loading control and displayed on a logarithmic scale.Data are represented as mean ± SEM. and therapeutic opportunities for patients.Furthermore, the genetic landscape for IRDs is complexifying, as it becomes increasingly evident that mutations in the same gene can give rise to differential phenotypes or even clinically distinct disorders (29).TBC1D32 is now another perfect example of the breakdown in borders between disorders.To date, TBC1D32 variants were only associated with OFD syndrome, a severe malformative disorder.However, here, we report pathogenic TBC1D32 variants in 4 patients from 3 independent families presenting clinically with RP.Furthermore, by combining an in vivo Xenopus model and human iPSC-derived retinal models, we describe a critical role for TBC1D32 in retinal differentiation and ciliogenesis and demonstrate that reduced TBC1D32 levels impact the RPE and photoreceptors.We thus identify TBC1D32 as a causative IRD gene.OFD syndromes form a rare subgroup of ciliopathies characterized by oral cavity, facial and digital anomalies with or without heart defects, polycystic kidney disease, or corpus callosum agenesis (30).There is a high clinical heterogeneity linked to 16 causative genes.The most frequent is the X-linked OFD1, which encodes a centrosomal protein.Interestingly, rare OFD1 patients have been described as presenting with nonsyndromic retinal degeneration (31), suggesting that variants in other OFD genes may also give rise to IRDs.In 2014, loss-of-function TBC1D32 variants were first described as associated with the OFD syndrome type IX (11).Clinical symptoms ranged from midline cleft, anophthalmia, polydactyly to choanal atresia, agenesis of corpus callosum, vermis and pituitary hypoplasia, and hydrocephalus.Subsequently, 7 patients from 5 families were reported as carrying different pathogenic TBC1D32 variants and presenting with syndromic ciliopathies (32).It is noteworthy that 1 patient from a Finnish family with compound heterozygous indels in TBC1D32 also exhibited a progressive retinal dystrophy, but this was not further explored (33).
Taking into account the clinical data in relation to age, none of the patients reported here showed signs of TBC1D32-related OFD syndrome.It should be noted, though, that MRI revealed mild subclinical alterations, which suggests that TBC1D32 variants may give rise to a disease spectrum with a certain threshold for the appearance of clinical signs.It is likely that type or severity of the associated variant accounts for this spectrum.We now raise the number of reported pathogenic TBC1D32 variants, identified in 8 unrelated families, to 10: 1 missense (c.3513G>T), 2 nonsense (c.1267G>T; c.3724C>T), 3 splicing (c.317+5G>A; c.1141-1G>A; c.1372+1G>T), and 4 indels (c.18_27del; c.846delTCCT; c.1165_1166dup; c.2151del) (refs.32-34 and this study).Although it is possible that nonsense and indel TBC1D32 variants result in loss of function, splicing and missense variants are more ambiguous.
The c.317+5G>A splicing variant, carried by patient 1 in trans to a frameshift indel, only results in mild RP, which is likely explained by the resulting in-frame exon skipping that may result in a shorter partially functional protein.Similarly, the c.1141-1G>A variant, carried by patient 2 in trans to a frameshift indel, which promotes the creation of multiple aberrant splicing variants, also did not result in severe syndromic disease.However, this patient presented with additional renal defects, which were possibly of a ciliopathic nature.An association between altered ciliary function and the development of renal cysts has been linked to variants in the ciliary function-related genes PKD1/PKD2 (35).Patient 2 was negative for pathogenic PKD1/PKD2 variants, raising the possibility that the renal anomalies may be due to the TBC1D32 variants.This is supported by the zebrafish tbc1d32 morphant model that shows dose-dependent ciliary defects in the distal kidney tubules (10) and the association of renal anomalies with other ciliopathies (7).Along this line, a recent study described developmental cochlear defects in the knockout Tbc1d32 mouse model (36), and we also detected tbc1d32 in the Xenopus otic vesicle, suggesting that TBC1D32 variants may also provoke ciliopathies with deafness associated.Finally, the mildest TBC1D32-associated phenotype reported to date is the later onset RP in patients 3 and 4 carrying the missense c.3513G>T variant in trans to a nonsense variant.The predicted structural changes associated with this variant suggest the production of a mutant protein, which we hypothesize may be partially functional to account for the moderate phenotype.Taken together, and in consideration of the dose-dependent phenotypic severity in the Xenopus tbc1d32 morphants, we propose that hypomorphic TBC1D32 variants give rise to RP and loss-of-function variants to OFD syndrome.
Pertinently, none of the patients showed ocular malformations, whereas they all presented with features of retinal degeneration that were compatible with both RPE and photoreceptor defects.These clinical data are strongly supported by our functional data.First, the phenotypes of the Xenopus tbc1d32 morphants and the human TBC1D32 iPSC-derived RPE models highlighted RPE differentiation defects that affected functionality.Most notably, the slowing down of retinoid recycling, as evidenced by retinosome accumulation, is reminiscent of the RPE defect associated with mutations in the visual cycle protein RPE65, which causes Leber congenital amaurosis (37).Visual cycle disruption reduces the availability of 11 cis-retinol, which subsequently impacts the phototransduction process causing visual impairment.Second, the Xenopus morphants and iPSC-derived retinal organoids showed photoreceptor differentiation anomalies and disturbed trafficking of photoreceptor proteins to the OS, which would affect their function.In addition, the disrupted apical VEGF secretion identified in the TBC1D32 iPSC-derived RPE would also impact neurodevelopment and photoreceptor protection throughout life (38), further impacting phototransduction and vision.
The disrupted ciliogenesis of the RPE and photoreceptors in both the Xenopus and human models leads us to propose that TBC1D32-associated RP is a retinal ciliopathy (7).In particular, we show that TBC1D32 defects result in elongated primary cilia in fibroblasts, the neural tube, and RPE cells.Ciliary length is determined by an interplay between ciliary assembly and disassembly processes, which rely on an effective

R E S E A R C H A R T I C L E
JCI Insight 2023;8(21):e169426 https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.169426bidirectional IFT system (39).There have been examples in the past of gene variants associated with retinal degeneration that result in elongated cilia.For example, variants in the gene encoding IFT172 have been associated with nonsyndromic or syndromic forms of RP (40,41), and elongated cilia were detected on patient fibroblasts (41).Similarly, variants in the gene encoding the transition zone protein CEP290 (42), associated with the early-onset retinal dystrophy Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA), resulted in elongated primary cilia on patient fibroblasts (43).Furthermore, these fibroblasts showed normal IFT88 distribution, similar to our observations on TBC1D32 cells, indicating that anterograde IFT was normal.Finally, variants in the gene encoding NPHP5/IQCB1 also associated with LCA were recently shown to provoke elongated primary cilia in patient-derived fibroblasts and iPSC-derived RPE (44), further validating that elongated ciliary defects give rise to retinal ciliopathies.
Importantly, we show that the tight junction defects of the TBC1D32 RPE were associated with an EMT-like phenotype both at the mRNA and protein levels.We did observe a slight discrepancy for β-catenin, as the decreased mRNA levels did not corroborate with the unchanged protein levels.The regulation of β-catenin in EMT, however, is highly complex due to the protein's dual roles in adhesion and transcription, and the interplay between these pools has not been elucidated (45).Nonetheless, we showed that there was a release of β-catenin into the cytosol, which would increase the transcriptionally active pool consistent with EMT (23).We can thus only speculate that, at the time of analysis, the RPE was in a dynamic EMT state and that feedback regulations on mRNA or protein levels were in process.TBC1D32 is an actor of the Hedgehog (HH) pathway in primary cilia, which acts to regulate the glioma-associated oncogene (GLI) family of transcription factors (46).TBC1D32 controls the HH pathway by allowing GLI proteins to be properly localized in the primary cilia and correctly activated in response to high-level HH signaling (10).In cancer cells, it has been shown that activated GLI proteins bind and transcribe genes that control EMT (namely SNAIL) among other cell processes (47).Therefore, our data suggest that ciliary elongation in the RPE due to TBC1D32 disruption may cause HH signaling perturbations, which would activate EMT, causing a loss of identity and function.Although beyond the scope of this manuscript, future studies should be aimed at precisely deciphering the link between TBC1D32, HH signaling, and EMT in the retina.Last, a similar link between primary ciliary defects and EMT in the RPE was also made in a murine model of the syndromic retinal ciliopathy Bardet-Biedl syndrome (BBS8 -/-), where an EMT-like phenotype was associated with defective cellular polarization and morphology (21), further validating our observations.
In general, the proteins encoded by OFD genes have been attributed to 3 functional modules in primary cilia: centriole elongation, transition zone, and intraflagellar transport (30).TBC1D32 was attributed to the elongation module as zebrafish tbc1d32 interacts with cell cycle-related kinase to regulate ciliary membrane and axonemal growth in the neural tube (10), and murine Tbc1d32 acts redundantly with the centrosomal protein Dzip1l to regulate ciliogenesis (48).We now demonstrate that TBC1D32 also regulates ciliogenesis in the retina in human and Xenopus models.Consistent with the fact that TBC1D32 is not associated with the intraflagellar transport module, we did not detect abnormal IFT88 distribution in TBC1D32 fibroblasts.Interestingly though, IFT88 pooling was reported in the fibroblasts of a TBC1D32-associated OFD type IX patient (19) and in a TBC1D32-knockout hTERT-RPE1 cell line (49).Furthermore, murine tbc1d32 -/-and zebrafish morphant models displayed curled axonemes enveloped by dilated ciliary membranes (10), in contrast with the elongated ciliary defect we report in the Xenopus-knockdown model and in TBC1D32 patient cells.These differences could be due to a dose-dependent effect related to the amount of remaining functional TBC1D32 protein.Thus, taken together, we propose that the severity of TBC1D32 disruption will lead to phenotypic variability at the level of the primary cilium and an ensuing disease spectrum.
In conclusion, we identify TBC1D32 as an IRD gene responsible for RP and broaden the clinical spectrum associated with TBC1D32 variants.As we identified pathogenic variants in multiple unrelated families, and as one of the probands also presented with renal anomalies, we highly recommend that TBC1D32 be added to the list of candidate genes to be screened for both isolated and syndromic RP.

Methods
Clinical investigations.Patients underwent a comprehensive ophthalmological examination (best-corrected visual acuity, kinetic visual field, SD-OCT, SW-FAF, color fundus photography, and full-field electroretinography performed in accordance with the guidelines of the International Society for Electrophysiology of Vision).Age of onset, initial symptoms, and extraocular manifestations were also reviewed.The systemic checkup included

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Multimodal imaging of the patients.Patient 1: (A) Color fundus photograph showing pallor of the optic nerve head and reduced caliber of the retinal vessels.Note the abnormal visibility of the choroidal vessels due to RPE damage in the midperiphery.(B) Short-wavelength fundus autofluorescence (SW-FAF) showing a parafoveal ring characteristic of RP (white arrows).(C) SD-OCT macular scan showing preserved segmentation in the foveal area with peripheral loss of the ellipsoidal zone (EZ) line nasal to the fovea (white arrow).Patient 2: (D) Color fundus photograph showing increased choroidal visibility beyond the temporal vascular arcades.Inset: pigment accumulation in the superior retinal periphery.(E) SW-FAF showing a relatively preserved intensity within the macular region and loss of the signal beyond the temporal vascular arcades.An incomplete hyperautofluorescent ring is visible in the temporal parafoveal region (yellow arrow).(F) SD-OCT scan along the horizontal meridian through the fovea showing preservation of retinal layers in the central macula and gradual disappearance of photoreceptor layers with increasing eccentricity in the temporal direction.The white arrow indicates the beginning of the disappearance of the EZ line.Patient 3: (G and H) Color fundus imaging of both eyes showing peripheral retinal bone spicules (blue arrows), papillary pallor, and evident atrophy of the RPE-choriocapillaris complex except in the macular area (delineated by white arrows).(I) SD-OCT macular scan showing an EZ line only visible beneath the fovea (between white arrows).

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. tbc1d32 expression during Xenopus development and retinogenesis.(A) Lateral views of Xenopus embryo heads (anterior to the right) following tbc1d32 whole-mount in situ hybridization.Enlargement: at stage 25, epidermal cells are stained.tbc1d32 expression is also detected in the eye (black arrows) and later in the pronephric nephrostomes (black dotted arrows), brain (black arrowheads), and otic vesicle (white arrowheads).(B) RNAscope in situ hybridizations for tbc1d32 and ihh on cryostat sections.A region of RPE cells, delineated by white dotted boxes in the upper panels, is enlarged in the lower panels, where the RPE layer is outlined (white lines).Scatterplots with bars represent the quantification of tbc1d32 expression in the RPE or photoreceptor layer at each stage (st).Data are represented as mean ± SEM.Each dot represents 1 retina.Scale bars = 400 μm in A, 50 μm in B. AU, arbitrary units; pR, presumptive retina; RPE, retinal pigment epithelium; PR, photoreceptors.(C) qPCR analysis of ihh and tbc1d32 expression in neural retina and RPE tissues, dissected at stage 35-36.ihh serves as a specific RPE marker.Data are represented as geometric mean with 95% CI; n = 3 technical replicates.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Xenopus RPE phenotype following tbc1d32 knockdown.(A) Mo1 and Mo2 target sequences located in the 5′ untranslated region of tbc1d32 mRNA.(B) Diagram of the experimental design.(C) Upper panels, lateral views of 1 control and 2 morphant embryo heads with moderate and severe phenotypes (anterior to the right).Lower panels, transverse retinal sections of control and morphant embryos (dorsal side up).The bar plot represents the percentage of embryos with a severe decrease in pigmentation among control (control Mo), morphant (tbc1d32 Mo1), tbc1d32 mRNA-injected, and tbc1d32 Mo1/tbc1d32 mRNA coinjected groups.The total number of embryos analyzed per condition is indicated in each bar.**P < 0.01; ****P < 0.0001; Fisher's exact test.(D) Phalloidin staining of filamentous actin on dissected eyes of control or morphant Xenopus embryos.The bar plot represents the proportion of eyes with an altered distribution of F-actin for each condition.The total number of eyes analyzed per condition is indicated in each bar.*P < 0.05; ****P < 0.0001; Fisher's exact test.Scale bars = 400 μm for whole mounts and 60 μm for sections in C, 20 μm in D.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Xenopus RPE and photoreceptor marker expression following tbc1d32 knockdown.(A) Diagram of the experimental design.Whole mount (B) or retinal sections (C) following in situ hybridization against mitf or ihh, respectively, on embryos injected with control Mo or tbc1d32 Mo1.Scatterplots represent the quantification of the integrated density of the staining per eye relative to control Mo; each dot corresponds to 1 eye or 1 section, respectively.(D) Rho and SM opsin immunolabeling on retinal sections of embryos injected with control Mo or embryos injected with 2 doses of tbc1d32 Mo1 (10 or 15 ng).Lower panels, enlargement of the areas indicated by white dashed boxes in the upper panels.The bar plot represents the proportion of eyes with altered staining of Rho and SM opsin for each condition.The number of eyes analyzed per condition is indicated in each bar.Rho, rhodopsin; SM opsin, short and middle wavelength cone opsin.(E) Upper panels, whole-mount in situ hybridization against rhodopsin in embryos injected with control Mo or tbc1d32 Mo1.Lower panels, transverse retinal sections of control and morphant embryos.The scatterplots represent the quantification of the integrated density of rhodopsin staining relative to control Mo; each dot corresponds to 1 eye (left) or 1 section (right).For all scatterplots, data are represented as mean ± SEM. **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001; Fisher's exact test (D); 2-tailed Mann-Whitney test (B, C, and E).Scale bars = 400 μm for whole-mount embryos and 40 μm for sections.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Xenopus ciliogenesis following tbc1d32 knockdown.(A) Arl13b and γ-Tubulin (γ-Tub) immunolabeling on neural tube sections of stage 35-36 wild-type (WT), control Mo, or tbc1d32 Mo1 embryos.(B) Scatterplot shows the mean length of neural tube cilia.Each dot corresponds to the mean length for 1 embryo.(C) Immunolabeling of cilia markers, acetylated α-Tubulin (α-Tub), Arl13b, and γ-Tub, on retinal sections of stage 35-36 WT embryo.The right panels show an enlargement of the area delineated by a white dotted box in the left panel.(D) α-Tub immunolabeling of RPE cilia (arrowheads) at different stages.Sections are costained with Otx2 to identify RPE cells, which are enlarged in the lower panels.NR, neural retina; ONL, outer nuclear layer; OS, outer segment.(E) Proportion of ciliated cells among RPE cells at different stages (st).(F) α-Tub and Otx2 immunolabeling showing primary RPE cilia (brackets) on retinal sections of stage 35 WT, control Mo, or tbc1d32 Mo1 embryos.(G) Scatterplot with bars showing the mean cilia length in RPE cells.Each dot corresponds to the mean length for 1 embryo.(H) Immunolabeling of Arl13b showing the photoreceptor connective cilium on retinal sections of stage 35 WT, control Mo, or tbc1d32 Mo1 embryos.(I) The scatterplot shows the mean number of Arl13 + ciliated photoreceptors in 1 field of the central retina.Each dot corresponds to 1 embryo.All data are represented as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001; 2-tailed Mann-Whitney test.Scale bars = 2 μm in A and F, 50 μm and 2 μm for enlargements in C, 5 μm and 2 μm for enlargements in D, 25 μm in H.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.Morphology of the primary cilium in human fibroblasts.IF studies and single plane confocal imaging to assay ciliogenesis in control (A, C, and E) and TBC1D32 (B, D, and F) fibroblasts with antibodies directed against ARL13B and acetylated α-tubulin (Ac αTUB; A and B), GT335 (C and D), and PCN (E and F).(G) Quantification of cilium length in control and TBC1D32 fibroblasts.Data are represented as mean ± SEM; n = 66 cells; ****P < 0.0001; Student's 2-tailed t test.IF studies to assay intraflagellar transport in control (H) and TBC1D32 (I) fibroblasts with antibodies directed against IFT88 and Ac αTUB.IF studies in control (J) and TBC1D32 (K) fibroblasts to assay the localization of TBC1D32 in relation to Ac αTUB.IF studies in control (L and N) and TBC1D32 (M and O) fibroblasts to assay the localization of TBC1D32 in relation to PCN in a basal (L and M) and apical (N and O) plane.Insets show a 2-fold magnification of the labeled basal bodies/centrosomes in each panel.Scale bars = 5 μm.

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. Morphology of the human iPSC-derived RPE.IF studies and maximum intensity projection (MIP) confocal imaging of control (A) and TBC1D32 (B) iPSC-derived RPE using antibodies directed against ZO1 and ARL13B.White arrows indicate elongated cilia.The disrupted TBC1D32 RPE monolayer can be seen on the orthogonal planes as compared with control.Scale bars = 10 μm.(C) Quantification of the cilium length in control (n = 229 cells) and TBC1D32 iPSC-derived RPE (n = 416 cells).Data are represented as mean ± SEM; ****P < 0.0001; Student's 2-tailed t test.(D) Higher magnification of control iPSC-derived RPE showing the regular cobblestone morphology and cilia length.(E) Higher magnification of TBC1D32 RPE showing irregularly shaped cells, separated tight junctions (white arrows), and ZO1 aggregates.Scale bars = 5 μm.(F) Weekly TER measurements expressed in Ω/cm 2 in control (black line) and TBC1D32 (gray line) iPSC-derived RPE.Data are represented as mean ± SEM; *P < 0.05; n = 4 inserts; 2-tailed Mann-Whitney test.

Figure 8 .
Figure 8. EMT-like phenotype in human TBC1D32 iPSC-derived RPE.IF studies and MIP confocal imaging of control (A) and TBC1D32 (B) iPSC-derived RPE using antibodies directed against vimentin and MERTK.The boxed area in B indicates areas of upregulated vimentin and disrupted MERTK expression.Scale bars = 20 μm.IF studies and MIP confocal imaging of control (C) and TBC1D32 (D) iPSC-derived RPE using antibodies directed against SMA and ZO1.Scale bars = 20 μm.qPCR analysis of CDH1 (E), CDH3 (F), CTNNB1 (G), SNAI1 (H), and FN1 (I) in control and TBC1D32 RPE.Data are represented as mean ± SEM; n = 3 technical replicates; *P < 0.05; 2-tailed Mann-Whitney test.Representative Western blot analysis of E-cadherin (J), P-cadherin (K), and β-catenin (L) expression and quantification relative to the β-actin loading control; the same membrane was hybridized with 2 different primary antibodies in panels J and L. Data represented as mean ± SEM; n = 3 blots; *P < 0.05; 2-tailed Mann-Whitney test.(M) Representative Western blot analysis and quantification of 2 independent blots of β-catenin distribution in the cytosol versus membrane fractions of control and TBC1D32 iPSC-derived RPE relative to the β-actin loading control and displayed on a logarithmic scale.Data are represented as mean ± SEM.

Figure 9 .
Figure 9. Retinosome accumulation and altered secretion in human TBC1D32 iPSC-derived RPE.IF studies and MIP confocal imaging of control (A) and TBC1D32 (B) iPSC-derived RPE using antibodies directed against N-cadherin and CRALBP.Redistribution of N-cadherin and CRALBP can be seen on the orthogonal planes.Scale bars = 10 μm.(C) Representative Western blot analysis and quantification of 2 independent blots of CRALBP distribution in the cytosol versus membrane fractions of control and TBC1D32 iPSC-derived RPE relative to the β-actin loading control.Data represented as mean ± SEM.TEM of control (D) and TBC1D32 (E) iPSC-derived RPE showing apical microvilli (MV), basal nuclei (N), pigmented melanosomes, and vesicles corresponding to lipid droplets (black arrow).Scale bar = 2 μm.(F) Quantification of the number of vesicles per cell in control (n = 38 cells) and TBC1D32 (n = 39 cells) RPE.Data are represented as mean ± SEM; ****P < 0.0001; Student's 2-tailed t test.(G) Representative Western blot analysis of perilipin expression and quantification relative to the β-actin loading control.Data represented as mean ± SEM. n = 3 blots; *P < 0.05; 2-tailed Mann-Whitney test.(H) ELISA of PEDF and VEGF secretion in apical and basal chambers of control and TBC1D32 RPE cultured on Transwell membrane inserts.Data are expressed as a percentage of control; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001; the number of samples are indicated within bars.Student's 2-tailed t test.

Figure 10 .
Figure 10.Morphology of human iPSC-derived retinal organoids.Brightfield microscopy of control (A) and TBC1D32 (B) retinal organoids at day 225 of differentiation showing the brush border.Scale bars = 100 μm.Higher magnification of the ONL of control (C) and TBC1D32 (D) organoids.Scale bars = 50 μm.IF studies and MIP confocal imaging of control (E, G, and I) and TBC1D32 (F, H, and J) organoids with antibodies directed to CRX and RCVRN (E and F) to assay general photoreceptor morphology, CRALBP and ZO1 to assay the OLM (G and H), and RK and ZO1 to assay the prolongation of the IS and OS (I and J).IF studies of control (K, M, and O) and TBC1D32 (L, N, and P) organoids with antibodies directed to ARL13B and RHO (K and L) to assay the CC and prolongation of the OS, ABCA4, and PDE6B (M and N) to assay the OS of rods and/or cones, and ARR3 and R/G opsin (O and P) to assay the cones.All nuclei are labeled with Hoechst.Scale bars = 20 μm.